Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26679184›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2016

AHA classification of coronary and carotid atherosclerotic plaques by grating-based phase-contrast computed tomography.

Holger Hetterich, Nicole Webber, Marian Willner, Julia Herzen, Lorenz Birnbacher, Alexander Hipp, Mathias Marschner, Sigrid D Auweter, Christopher Habbel, Ulrich Schüller and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Advances in CT Techniques in Vascular Calcification.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021
    Review
  17. Diabetic vasculopathy: macro and microvascular injury.Current pathobiology reports · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Holger HetterichInstitute of Clinical Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilian University Hospital, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. Holger.Hetterich@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Nicole WebberInstitute of Clinical Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilian University Hospital, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Marian WillnerLehrstuhl für Biomedizinische Physik, Physik-Department & Institut für Medizintechnik, Technische Universität München, 85748, Garching, Germany.
Julia HerzenLehrstuhl für Biomedizinische Physik, Physik-Department & Institut für Medizintechnik, Technische Universität München, 85748, Garching, Germany.
Lorenz BirnbacherLehrstuhl für Biomedizinische Physik, Physik-Department & Institut für Medizintechnik, Technische Universität München, 85748, Garching, Germany.
Alexander HippLehrstuhl für Biomedizinische Physik, Physik-Department & Institut für Medizintechnik, Technische Universität München, 85748, Garching, Germany.
Mathias MarschnerLehrstuhl für Biomedizinische Physik, Physik-Department & Institut für Medizintechnik, Technische Universität München, 85748, Garching, Germany.
Sigrid D AuweterInstitute of Clinical Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilian University Hospital, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Christopher HabbelInstitute of Clinical Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilian University Hospital, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Ulrich SchüllerCenter for Neuropathology, Ludwig-Maximilian University Hospital, Munich, Germany.
Fabian BambergInstitute of Clinical Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilian University Hospital, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Birgit Ertl-WagnerInstitute of Clinical Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilian University Hospital, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Franz PfeifferLehrstuhl für Biomedizinische Physik, Physik-Department & Institut für Medizintechnik, Technische Universität München, 85748, Garching, Germany.
Tobias SaamInstitute of Clinical Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilian University Hospital, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the potential of grating-based phase-contrast computed-tomography (gb-PCCT) to classify human carotid and coronary atherosclerotic plaques according to modified American Heart Association (AHA) criteria.

methodsExperiments were carried out at a laboratory-based set-up consisting of X-ray tube (40 kVp), grating-interferometer and detector. Eighteen human carotid and coronary artery specimens were examined. Histopathology served as the standard of reference. Vessel cross-sections were classified as AHA lesion type I/II, III, IV/V, VI, VII or VIII plaques by two independent reviewers blinded to histopathology. Conservative measurements of diagnostic accuracies for the detection and differentiation of plaque types were evaluated.

resultsA total of 127 corresponding gb-PCCT/histopathology sections were analyzed. Based on histopathology, lesion type I/II was present in 12 (9.5 %), III in 18 (14.2 %), IV/V in 38 (29.9 %), VI in 16 (12.6 %), VII in 34 (26.8 %) and VIII in 9 (7.0 %) cross-sections. Sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive value were ≥0.88 for most analyzed plaque types with a good level of agreement (Cohen's kappa = 0.90). Overall, results were better in carotid (kappa = 0.97) than in coronary arteries (kappa = 0.85). Inter-observer agreement was high with kappa = 0.85, p < 0.0001.

conclusionsThese results indicate that gb-PCCT can reliably classify atherosclerotic plaques according to modified AHA criteria with excellent agreement to histopathology. KEY POINTS: • Different atherosclerotic plaque types display distinct morphological features in phase-contrast CT. • Phase-contrast CT can detect and differentiate AHA plaque types. • Calcifications caused streak artefacts and reduced sensitivity in type VI lesions. • Overall agreement was higher in carotid than in coronary arteries.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAmerican Heart AssociationCarotid ArteriesCoronary VesselsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObserver VariationPlaque, AtheroscleroticProspective StudiesRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityTomography, X-Ray ComputedAtherosclerosisCardiac imaging techniquesCarotid arteriesComputed x-ray tomographyCoronary vessels

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.