Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26678996›Full record

SynthesisBMC public health2015

Implementation conditions for diet and physical activity interventions and policies: an umbrella review.

Karolina Horodyska, Aleksandra Luszczynska, Catherine B Hayes, Miriam P O'Shea, Lars J Langøien, Gun Roos, Matthijs van den Berg, Marieke Hendriksen, Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij, Johannes Brug

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Healthy eating strategies for socioeconomically disadvantaged populations: a meta-ethnography.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Determinants of diet and physical activity (DEDIPAC): a summary of findings.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Karolina HorodyskaDepartment of Psychology, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, 30b Ostrowskiego St, 53238, Wroclaw, Poland. khorodyska@swps.edu.pl.
Aleksandra LuszczynskaDepartment of Psychology, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, 30b Ostrowskiego St, 53238, Wroclaw, Poland. aluszczy@uccs.edu.
Catherine B HayesDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Trinity College Dublin, Centre for Health Sciences, Tallaght Hospital, Dublin 24, Ireland. hayesc9@tcd.ie.
Miriam P O'SheaDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Trinity College Dublin, Centre for Health Sciences, Tallaght Hospital, Dublin 24, Ireland. osheami@tcd.ie.
Lars J LangøienDepartment for Physical Education, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, P.O. BOX 4014, Ullevål Stadion, N-0806, Oslo, Norway. langoien@gmail.com.
Gun RoosSIFO - National Institute for Consumer Research, P.O. BOX 4682, Nydalen, N-0405, Oslo, Norway. gun.roos@sifo.hioa.no.
Matthijs van den BergNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, 3721, Bilthoven, The Netherlands. matthijs.van.den.berg@rivm.nl.
Marieke HendriksenNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, 3721, Bilthoven, The Netherlands. marieke.hendriksen@rivm.nl.
Ilse De BourdeaudhuijDepartment of Movement and Sport Sciences, Ghent University, Watersportlaan 2, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. Ilse.Debourdeaudhuij@ugent.be.
Johannes BrugVU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. j.brug@vumc.nl.
National Institute for Public Health and the Environment · NLTallaght University Hospital · IEUniwersytet SWPS · PLAmsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLGhent University · BENorwegian School of Sport Sciences · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis umbrella review aimed at identifying evidence-based conditions important for successful implementation of interventions and policies promoting a healthy diet, physical activity (PA), and a reduction in sedentary behaviors (SB). In particular, we examined if the implementation conditions identified were intervention-specific or policy-specific. This study was undertaken as part of the DEterminants of DIet and Physical Activity (DEDIPAC) Knowledge Hub, a joint action as part of the European Joint Programming Initiative a Healthy Diet for a Healthy Life.

methodsA systematic review of reviews and stakeholder documents was conducted. Data from nine scientific literature databases were analyzed (95 documents met the inclusion criteria). Additionally, published documentation of eight major stakeholders (e.g., World Health Organization) were systematically searched (17 documents met the inclusion criteria). The RE-AIM framework was used to categorize elicited conditions. Across the implementation conditions 25 % were identified in at least four documents and were subsequently classified as having obtained sufficient support.

resultsWe identified 312 potential conditions relevant for successful implementation; 83 of these received sufficient support. Using the RE-AIM framework eight implementation conditions that obtained support referred to the reach in the target population; five addressed efficacy of implementation processes; 24 concerned adoption by the target staff, setting, or institutions; 43 referred to consistency, costs, and adaptations made in the implementation process; three addressed maintenance of effects over time. The vast majority of implementation conditions (87.9 %; 73 of 83) were supported by documents referring to both interventions and policies. There were seven policy-specific implementation conditions, which focused on increasing complexities of coexisting policies/legal instruments and their consequences for implementation, as well as politicians' collaboration in implementation.

conclusionsThe use of the proposed list of 83 conditions for successful implementation may enhance the implementation of interventions and policies which pursue identification of the most successful actions aimed at improving diet, PA and reducing SB.

Indexed as

DietExerciseHealth PolicyCooperative BehaviorHealth PromotionHumansSedentary BehaviorWorld Health Organization

Identifiers

PMID26678996
PMCPMC4683715
OpenAlexW2218719391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.