Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26678993›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Xenotransplantation of Human Cardiomyocyte Progenitor Cells Does Not Improve Cardiac Function in a Porcine Model of Chronic Ischemic Heart Failure. Results from a Randomized, Blinded, Placebo Controlled Trial.

Sanne J Jansen of Lorkeers, Johannes M I H Gho, Stefan Koudstaal, Gerardus P J van Hout, Peter Paul M Zwetsloot, Joep W M van Oorschot, Esther C M van Eeuwijk, Tim Leiner, Imo E Hoefer, Marie-José Goumans and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Anesthesia Protocols used to Create Ischemia Reperfusion Myocardial Infarcts in Swine.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sanne J Jansen of LorkeersDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Johannes M I H GhoDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Stefan KoudstaalDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Gerardus P J van HoutExperimental Cardiology Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Peter Paul M ZwetslootDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Joep W M van OorschotDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Esther C M van EeuwijkExperimental Cardiology Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Tim LeinerDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Imo E HoeferExperimental Cardiology Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Marie-José GoumansDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Pieter A DoevendansDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Joost P G SluijterICIN - Netherlands Heart Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Steven A J ChamuleauDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLNetherlands Heart Institute · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecently cardiomyocyte progenitor cells (CMPCs) were successfully isolated from fetal and adult human hearts. Direct intramyocardial injection of human CMPCs (hCMPCs) in experimental mouse models of acute myocardial infarction significantly improved cardiac function compared to controls.

aimHere, our aim was to investigate whether xenotransplantation via intracoronary infusion of fetal hCMPCs in a pig model of chronic myocardial infarction is safe and efficacious, in view of translation purposes. METHODS &

resultsWe performed a randomized, blinded, placebo controlled trial. Four weeks after ischemia/reperfusion injury by 90 minutes of percutaneous left anterior descending artery occlusion, pigs (n = 16, 68.5 ± 5.4 kg) received intracoronary infusion of 10 million fetal hCMPCs or placebo. All animals were immunosuppressed by cyclosporin (CsA). Four weeks after infusion, endpoint analysis by MRI displayed no difference in left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular end diastolic and left ventricular end systolic volumes between both groups. Serial pressure volume (PV-)loop and echocardiography showed no differences in functional parameters between groups at any timepoint. Infarct size at follow-up, measured by late gadolinium enhancement MRI showed no difference between groups. Intracoronary pressure and flow measurements showed no signs of coronary obstruction 30 minutes after cell infusion. No premature death occurred in cell treated animals.

conclusionXenotransplantation via intracoronary infusion of hCMPCs is feasible and safe, but not associated with improved left ventricular performance and infarct size compared to placebo in a porcine model of chronic myocardial infarction.

Indexed as

Stem Cell TransplantationTransplantation, HeterologousAnimalsChronic DiseaseHeartMagnetic Resonance ImagingMyocardial IschemiaMyocytes, CardiacPlacebosStem CellsSwineVentricular Function, LeftPlacebos

Identifiers

PMID26678993
PMCPMC4683045
OpenAlexW2286918083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.