Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26678856›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

γ-Secretase Modulators and APH1 Isoforms Modulate γ-Secretase Cleavage but Not Position of ε-Cleavage of the Amyloid Precursor Protein (APP).

Christian B Lessard, Barbara A Cottrell, Hiroko Maruyama, Suraj Suresh, Todd E Golde, Edward H Koo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Christian B LessardDepartment of Neurosciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Barbara A CottrellDepartment of Neurosciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Hiroko MaruyamaDepartment of Neurosciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Suraj SureshDepartment of Neurosciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Todd E GoldeCenter for Translational Research in Neurodegenerative Disease, Department of Neuroscience, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Florida, United States of America.
Edward H KooDepartment of Neurosciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
University of California, San Diego · USNational University of Singapore · SGUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

TARGET IDENTIFICATION AND MECHANISMS OF ACTIONS OF y-SECRETASE MODULATORSP01AG020206 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI GOLDE, TODD E · 2002 to 2013
$13.2M
Targeting y-secretase in GVHDP01CA166009 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI OSBORNE, BARBARA A · 2013 to 2017
$4.9M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA166009NIA NIH HHS AG 20206NIA NIH HHS P01 AG020206
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relative increase in Aβ42 peptides from familial Alzheimer disease (FAD) linked APP and PSEN mutations can be related to changes in both ε-cleavage site utilization and subsequent step-wise cleavage. Cleavage at the ε-site releases the amyloid precursor protein (APP) intracellular domain (AICD), and perturbations in the position of ε-cleavage are closely associated with changes in the profile of amyloid β-protein (Aβ) species that are produced and secreted. The mechanisms by which γ-secretase modulators (GSMs) or FAD mutations affect the various γ-secretase cleavages to alter the generation of Aβ peptides have not been fully elucidated. Recent studies suggested that GSMs do not modulate ε-cleavage of APP, but the data were derived principally from recombinant truncated epitope tagged APP substrate. Here, using full length APP from transfected cells, we investigated whether GSMs modify the ε-cleavage of APP under more native conditions. Our results confirmed the previous findings that ε-cleavage is insensitive to GSMs. In addition, fenofibrate, an inverse GSM (iGSM), did not alter the position or kinetics of ε-cleavage position in vitro. APH1A and APH1B, a subunit of the γ-secretase complex, also modulated Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio without any alterations in ε-cleavage, a result in contrast to what has been observed with PS1 and APP FAD mutations. Consequently, GSMs and APH1 appear to modulate γ-secretase activity and Aβ42 generation by altering processivity but not ε-cleavage site utilization.

Indexed as

Amyloid beta-Protein PrecursorAmyloid Precursor Protein SecretasesAnimalsCatalytic DomainCHO CellsCricetulusEndopeptidasesFenofibrateHEK293 CellsHumansImmunoprecipitationMembrane ProteinsMutationPeptide FragmentsPeptide HydrolasesProtein IsoformsAmyloid beta-Protein Precursoramyloid beta-protein precursor C-terminal fragment beta, humanAmyloid Precursor Protein SecretasesAPH1A protein, humanEndopeptidasesFenofibrateMembrane ProteinsPeptide FragmentsPeptide HydrolasesProtein Isoforms

Identifiers

PMID26678856
PMCPMC4683055
OpenAlexW2203141938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.