Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26678701›Full record

ArticleToxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology2016

Designing More Efficient Preclinical Experiments: A Simulation Study in Chemotherapy-Induced Myelosupression.

Emma C Martin, Leon Aarons, James W T Yates

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emma C Martin*Centre for Applied Pharmacokinetic Research, Manchester Pharmacy School, the University of Manchester, M13 9PT, United Kingdom and emma.martin@manchester.ac.uk.
Leon Aarons*Centre for Applied Pharmacokinetic Research, Manchester Pharmacy School, the University of Manchester, M13 9PT, United Kingdom and.
James W T YatesAstraZeneca, Innovative Medicines, Oncology, Modelling and Simulation, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0RE, United Kingdom.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A new more efficient preclinical study design (referred to as a compact design) is proposed that removes the need for satellite animals for the collection of toxicokinetic (TK) data by sampling from the main study animals, taking no more than one sample in 24 h to build up a full profile over the course of the study. The compact design's performance was tested with a simulation study, using an example of chemotherapy-induced myelosupression in rats. Data sets were simulated from a model based on available data, following both the compact design and a traditional design using satellite animals, with 100 studies being simulated for each. The effect of the compact design on parameter and variance estimates for the TK and neutrophil models were investigated, as well as the potential effect of interoccasion variability (IOV). The compact design performed equally as well as the traditional design, and had little impact on parameter or variation estimates, indicating that it would be a suitable alternative to traditional satellite designs while reducing the number of animals required. When IOV was present but not accounted for during the TK analysis some parameter estimates were biased and interindividual variation and residual errors inflated; this was reduced by allowing for IOV in the analysis. Using the compact design removes the need for a satellite group, reducing the number of animals required, without affecting the ability to model the data. If large IOV is suspected, caution should be exercised to avoid parameter estimation bias, and inflation of variability and residual error.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalResearch DesignAnimalsBone MarrowCell ProliferationComputer SimulationDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalDrugs, InvestigationalFemaleMaleNeutrophilsRatsDrugs, Investigational3Rspharmacodynamicspreclinical study designtoxicokinetics

Identifiers

PMID26678701
PMCPMC4767189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.