Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26678620›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Drug discovery2016

Gasotransmitters in cancer: from pathophysiology to experimental therapy.

Csaba Szabo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Drug discovery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 238 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
238citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

238 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Sequential HAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Intracellular Crosstalk of the Gasotransmitter Trio (NO, CO, HInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. HAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. HJournal of nanobiotechnology · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Role of cystathionine-β-synthase and hydrogen sulfide in down syndrome.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Review

178 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Csaba SzaboDepartment of Anesthesiology, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, 601 Harborside Drive, Galveston, Texas 77555, USA.

Funding

Role of Hydrogen Sulfide in Colorectal TumorsR01CA175803 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI HELLMICH, MARK R, SZABO, CSABA · 2014 to 2018
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA175803NCI NIH HHS R01CA175803
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The three endogenous gaseous transmitters - nitric oxide (NO), carbon monoxide (CO) and hydrogen sulfide (H2S) - regulate a number of key biological functions. Emerging data have revealed several new mechanisms for each of these three gasotransmitters in tumour biology. It is now appreciated that they show bimodal pharmacological character in cancer, in that not only the inhibition of their biosynthesis but also elevation of their concentration beyond a certain threshold can exert anticancer effects. This Review discusses the role of each gasotransmitter in cancer and the effects of pharmacological agents - some of which are in early-stage clinical studies - that modulate the levels of each gasotransmitter. A clearer understanding of the pharmacological character of these three gases and the mechanisms underlying their biological effects is expected to guide further clinical translation.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsCarbon MonoxideGasotransmittersHumansHydrogen SulfideNeoplasmsNitric OxideTherapies, InvestigationalAntineoplastic AgentsCarbon MonoxideGasotransmittersHydrogen SulfideNitric Oxide

Identifiers

PMID26678620
PMCPMC5319818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.