ArticleGenes, brain, and behavior2016
Epistatic partners of neurogenic genes modulate Drosophila olfactory behavior.
Article in Genes, brain, and behavior, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pleiotropy, epistasis and the genetic architecture of quantitative traits.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2024Review
- The genetic architecture of behavioral canalization.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2023Review
- Phenelzine-based probes reveal Secernin-3 is involved in thermal nociception.Molecular and cellular neurosciences · 2023Article
- Epistasis for head morphology in Drosophila melanogaster.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2021Article
- Article
- Evolution of Epistatic Networks and the Genetic Basis of Innate Behaviors.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2020Review
- Evolution of Reproductive Behavior.Genetics · 2020Review
- Hybrid Incompatibilities and Transgressive Gene Expression Between Two Closely Related Subspecies ofFrontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Using tree-based methods for detection of gene-gene interactions in the presence of a polygenic signal: simulation study with application to educational attainment in the Generation Scotland Cohort Study.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019Article
- The Sleep Inbred Panel, a Collection of InbredG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2018Article
- The Evolution of Gene Expression in cis and trans.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2018Review
- Pervasive genetic interactions modulate neurodevelopmental defects of the autism-associated 16p11.2 deletion in Drosophila melanogaster.Nature communications · 2018Article
- The road less traveled: from genotype to phenotype in flies and humans.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2018Article
- Article
- Charting the genotype-phenotype map: lessons from the Drosophila melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Developmental biology · 2018Review
- How well do you know your mutation? Complex effects of genetic background on expressivity, complementation, and ordering of allelic effects.PLoS genetics · 2017Article
- Weak Polygenic Selection Drives the Rapid Adaptation of the Chemosensory System: Lessons from the Upstream Regions of the Major Gene Families.Genome biology and evolution · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The extent to which epistasis affects the genetic architecture of complex traits is difficult to quantify, and identifying variants in natural populations with epistatic interactions is challenging. Previous studies in Drosophila implicated extensive epistasis between variants in genes that affect neural connectivity and contribute to natural variation in olfactory response to benzaldehyde. In this study, we implemented a powerful screen to quantify the extent of epistasis as well as identify candidate interacting variants using 203 inbred wild-derived lines with sequenced genomes of the Drosophila melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel (DGRP). We crossed the DGRP lines to P[GT1]-element insertion mutants in Sema-5c and neuralized (neur), two neurodevelopmental loci which affect olfactory behavior, and to their coisogenic wild-type control. We observed significant variation in olfactory responses to benzaldehyde among F1 genotypes and for the DGRP line by mutant genotype interactions for both loci, showing extensive nonadditive genetic variation. We performed genome-wide association analyses to identify the candidate modifier loci. None of these polymorphisms were in or near the focal genes; therefore, epistasis is the cause of the nonadditive genetic variance. Candidate genes could be placed in interaction networks. Several candidate modifiers are associated with neural development. Analyses of mutants of candidate epistatic partners with neur (merry-go-round (mgr), prospero (pros), CG10098, Alhambra (Alh) and CG12535) and Sema-5c (CG42540 and bruchpilot (brp)) showed aberrant olfactory responses compared with coisogenic controls. Thus, integrating genome-wide analyses of natural variants with mutations at defined genomic locations in a common coisogenic background can unmask specific epistatic modifiers of behavioral phenotypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.