Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26678546›Full record

ArticleGenes, brain, and behavior2016

Epistatic partners of neurogenic genes modulate Drosophila olfactory behavior.

X He, S Zhou, G E St Armour, T F C Mackay, R R H Anholt

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, brain, and behavior, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. The road less traveled: from genotype to phenotype in flies and humans.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

X HeDepartment of Entomology, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
S ZhouDepartment of Biological Sciences, Program in Genetics and W. M. Keck Center for Behavioral Biology, Raleigh, NC, USA.
G E St ArmourDepartment of Biological Sciences, Program in Genetics and W. M. Keck Center for Behavioral Biology, Raleigh, NC, USA.
T F C MackayDepartment of Biological Sciences, Program in Genetics and W. M. Keck Center for Behavioral Biology, Raleigh, NC, USA.
R R H AnholtDepartment of Biological Sciences, Program in Genetics and W. M. Keck Center for Behavioral Biology, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Center for Human Genetics · USSouth China Agricultural University · CN

Funding

Molecular Genetics of Olfaction in DrosophiliaR01GM059469 · NIGMS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI ANHOLT, ROBERT R. H, MACKAY, TRUDY F. · 1999 to 2016
$5.8M
TRAINING IN BIOCHEMICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGYT32ES007046 · NIEHS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI Seth William Kullman · 1985 to 2026
$5.1M
QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI IN DROSOPHILAR01GM045146 · NIGMS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI ANHOLT, ROBERT R. H, MACKAY, TRUDY F. · 1991 to 2012
$5.1M
NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007046NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES7046-35NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM045146NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM059469
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The extent to which epistasis affects the genetic architecture of complex traits is difficult to quantify, and identifying variants in natural populations with epistatic interactions is challenging. Previous studies in Drosophila implicated extensive epistasis between variants in genes that affect neural connectivity and contribute to natural variation in olfactory response to benzaldehyde. In this study, we implemented a powerful screen to quantify the extent of epistasis as well as identify candidate interacting variants using 203 inbred wild-derived lines with sequenced genomes of the Drosophila melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel (DGRP). We crossed the DGRP lines to P[GT1]-element insertion mutants in Sema-5c and neuralized (neur), two neurodevelopmental loci which affect olfactory behavior, and to their coisogenic wild-type control. We observed significant variation in olfactory responses to benzaldehyde among F1 genotypes and for the DGRP line by mutant genotype interactions for both loci, showing extensive nonadditive genetic variation. We performed genome-wide association analyses to identify the candidate modifier loci. None of these polymorphisms were in or near the focal genes; therefore, epistasis is the cause of the nonadditive genetic variance. Candidate genes could be placed in interaction networks. Several candidate modifiers are associated with neural development. Analyses of mutants of candidate epistatic partners with neur (merry-go-round (mgr), prospero (pros), CG10098, Alhambra (Alh) and CG12535) and Sema-5c (CG42540 and bruchpilot (brp)) showed aberrant olfactory responses compared with coisogenic controls. Thus, integrating genome-wide analyses of natural variants with mutations at defined genomic locations in a common coisogenic background can unmask specific epistatic modifiers of behavioral phenotypes.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyAnimalsBehavior, AnimalDrosophila melanogasterEpistasis, GeneticGenes, InsectGenetic VariationGenotypeMutationOlfactory BulbPhenotypeChemosensationDrosophila melanogaster Genetic Reference Panelgenetic architecturegenome-wide association studyquantitative traits

Identifiers

PMID26678546
PMCPMC4841442
OpenAlexW2199824220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.