Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26678082›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2016

MMEJ-assisted gene knock-in using TALENs and CRISPR-Cas9 with the PITCh systems.

Tetsushi Sakuma, Shota Nakade, Yuto Sakane, Ken-Ichi T Suzuki, Takashi Yamamoto

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 232 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
232citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

232 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. SORT LNPs encapsulating Cas9 mRNA achieve efficient editing in skeletal muscle in a dystrophic mouse model.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Ratiometric transcriptional activation by protein degradation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Emerging tools to advance neuroethology in butterflies and moths.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

172 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tetsushi SakumaDepartment of Mathematical and Life Sciences, Graduate School of Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Shota NakadeDepartment of Mathematical and Life Sciences, Graduate School of Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Yuto SakaneDepartment of Mathematical and Life Sciences, Graduate School of Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Ken-Ichi T SuzukiDepartment of Mathematical and Life Sciences, Graduate School of Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Takashi YamamotoDepartment of Mathematical and Life Sciences, Graduate School of Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Programmable nucleases enable engineering of the genome by utilizing endogenous DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair pathways. Although homologous recombination (HR)-mediated gene knock-in is well established, it cannot necessarily be applied in every cell type and organism because of variable HR frequencies. We recently reported an alternative method of gene knock-in, named the PITCh (Precise Integration into Target Chromosome) system, assisted by microhomology-mediated end-joining (MMEJ). MMEJ harnesses independent machinery from HR, and it requires an extremely short homologous sequence (5-25 bp) for DSB repair, resulting in precise gene knock-in with a more easily constructed donor vector. Here we describe a streamlined protocol for PITCh knock-in, including the design and construction of the PITCh vectors, and their delivery to either human cell lines by transfection or to frog embryos by microinjection. The construction of the PITCh vectors requires only a few days, and the entire process takes ∼ 1.5 months to establish knocked-in cells or ∼ 1 week from injection to early genotyping in frog embryos.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell LineChromosomesCRISPR-Cas SystemsDNA End-Joining RepairDNA Restriction EnzymesGene Knock-In TechniquesHumansSequence Homology, Nucleic AcidDNA Restriction Enzymes

Identifiers

PMID26678082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.