Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26677873›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016

Macroautophagy is dispensable for growth of KRAS mutant tumors and chloroquine efficacy.

Christina H Eng, Zuncai Wang, Diane Tkach, Lourdes Toral-Barza, Savuth Ugwonali, Shanming Liu, Stephanie L Fitzgerald, Elizabeth George, Elizabeth Frias, Nadire Cochran and 10 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 151 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
151citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
17.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

151 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 221 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Autophagy modulation in cancer.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

91 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Christina H EngOncology Research Unit, Pfizer, Pearl River, NY 10965; christina.eng@pfizer.com beat.nyfeler@novartis.com.
Zuncai WangDepartment of Developmental and Molecular Pathways, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, MA 02139;
Diane TkachOncology Research Unit, Pfizer, Pearl River, NY 10965;
Lourdes Toral-BarzaOncology Research Unit, Pfizer, Pearl River, NY 10965;
Savuth UgwonaliDepartment of Developmental and Molecular Pathways, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, MA 02139;
Shanming LiuDepartment of Developmental and Molecular Pathways, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, MA 02139;
Stephanie L FitzgeraldDepartment of Developmental and Molecular Pathways, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, MA 02139;
Elizabeth GeorgeDepartment of Developmental and Molecular Pathways, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, MA 02139;
Elizabeth FriasDepartment of Developmental and Molecular Pathways, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, MA 02139;
Nadire CochranDepartment of Developmental and Molecular Pathways, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, MA 02139;
Rowena De JesusDepartment of Developmental and Molecular Pathways, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, MA 02139;
Gregory McAllisterDepartment of Developmental and Molecular Pathways, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, MA 02139;
Gregory R HoffmanDepartment of Developmental and Molecular Pathways, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, MA 02139;
Kevin BrayOncology Research Unit, Pfizer, Pearl River, NY 10965;
LuAnna LemonOncology Research Unit, Pfizer, Pearl River, NY 10965;
Judy LucasOncology Research Unit, Pfizer, Pearl River, NY 10965;
Valeria R FantinOncology Research Unit, Pfizer, San Diego, CA 92121;
Robert T AbrahamOncology Research Unit, Pfizer, San Diego, CA 92121;
Leon O MurphyDepartment of Developmental and Molecular Pathways, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, MA 02139;
Beat NyfelerDepartment of Developmental and Molecular Pathways, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland christina.eng@pfizer.com beat.nyfeler@novartis.com.
Pathways Behavioral Services · USPfizer (United States) · USNovartis Institutes for BioMedical Research

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Macroautophagy is a key stress-response pathway that can suppress or promote tumorigenesis depending on the cellular context. Notably, Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS)-driven tumors have been reported to rely on macroautophagy for growth and survival, suggesting a potential therapeutic approach of using autophagy inhibitors based on genetic stratification. In this study, we evaluated whether KRAS mutation status can predict the efficacy to macroautophagy inhibition. By profiling 47 cell lines with pharmacological and genetic loss-of-function tools, we were unable to confirm that KRAS-driven tumor lines require macroautophagy for growth. Deletion of autophagy-related 7 (ATG7) by genome editing completely blocked macroautophagy in several tumor lines with oncogenic mutations in KRAS but did not inhibit cell proliferation in vitro or tumorigenesis in vivo. Furthermore, ATG7 knockout did not sensitize cells to irradiation or to several anticancer agents tested. Interestingly, ATG7-deficient and -proficient cells were equally sensitive to the antiproliferative effect of chloroquine, a lysosomotropic agent often used as a pharmacological tool to evaluate the response to macroautophagy inhibition. Moreover, both cell types manifested synergistic growth inhibition when treated with chloroquine plus the tyrosine kinase inhibitors erlotinib or sunitinib, suggesting that the antiproliferative effects of chloroquine are independent of its suppressive actions on autophagy.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsAutophagyAutophagy-Related Protein 7Cell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCell Transformation, NeoplasticChloroquineDrug Resistance, NeoplasmErlotinib HydrochlorideGene Knockout TechniquesHumansIndolesMutationProtein Kinase InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)PyrrolesAntineoplastic AgentsATG7 protein, humanAutophagy-Related Protein 7ChloroquineErlotinib HydrochlorideIndolesKRAS protein, humanProtein Kinase InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)PyrrolesSunitinibUbiquitin-Activating EnzymesATG7autophagycancerchloroquineKRAS

Identifiers

PMID26677873
PMCPMC4711870
OpenAlexW2201033040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.