Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26677353›Full record

ReviewPostepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology2015

Bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in acute coronary syndromes: clinical evidence, tips and tricks.

Giuseppe Giacchi, Luis Ortega-Paz, Salvatore Brugaletta, Kohki Ishida, Manel Sabaté

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Antithrombotic management in patients with percutaneous coronary intervention requiring oral anticoagulation.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2016
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Giuseppe GiacchiCardiology Department, Thorax Institute, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Luis Ortega-PazCardiology Department, Thorax Institute, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Salvatore BrugalettaCardiology Department, Thorax Institute, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Kohki IshidaCardiology Department, Thorax Institute, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Manel SabatéCardiology Department, Thorax Institute, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with a drug-eluting stent (DES) is routine treatment for patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). However, permanent metallic caging of the vessel has several shortcomings, such as side branch jailing and impossibility of late lumen enlargement. Moreover, DES PCI is affected by vasomotion impairment. In ACS a high thrombus burden and vasospasm lead to a higher risk of acute and late acquired stent malapposition than in stable patients. This increases the risk of acute, late and very late stent thrombosis. In this challenging clinical setting, the implantation of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) could represent an appealing therapeutic option. Temporary vessel scaffolding has proved to have several advantages over metallic stent delivery, such as framework reabsorption, late lumen enlargement, side branch patency, and recovery of physiological reactivity to vasoactive stimuli. In the thrombotic environment of ACS, BVS implantation has the benefit of capping the thrombus and the vulnerable plaque. Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds also seems to reduce the incidence of angina during follow-up. Acute coronary syndromes patients may therefore benefit more from temporary polymeric caging than from permanent stent platform implantation. The aim of this review is to update the available knowledge concerning the use of BVS in ACS patients, by analyzing the potential pitfalls in this challenging clinical setting and presenting tricks to overcome these limitations.

Indexed as

acute coronary syndromebioresorbable vascular scaffoldpercutaneous coronary interventionST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID26677353
PMCPMC4631727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.