Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26677229›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of biological chemistry2016

A Unique Tool for Cellular Structural Biology: In-cell NMR.

Enrico Luchinat, Lucia Banci

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The role of native cysteine residues in the oligomerization of KCNQ1 channels.Biochemical and biophysical research communications · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Common sequence motifs of nascent chains engage the ribosome surface and trigger factor.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. In-Cell NMR of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins in Mammalian Cells.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2020
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. In-Cell NMR Study of Tau and MARK2 Phosphorylated Tau.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Enrico LuchinatFrom the Magnetic Resonance Center (CERM), the Department of Biomedical, Clinical and Experimental Sciences, and.
Lucia BanciFrom the Magnetic Resonance Center (CERM), the Department of Chemistry, University of Florence, Florence 50121, Italy banci@cerm.unifi.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional structural and chemical biology approaches are applied to macromolecules extrapolated from their native context. When this is done, important structural and functional features of macromolecules, which depend on their native network of interactions within the cell, may be lost. In-cell nuclear magnetic resonance is a branch of biomolecular NMR spectroscopy that allows macromolecules to be analyzed in living cells, at the atomic level. In-cell NMR can be applied to several cellular systems to obtain biologically relevant structural and functional information. Here we summarize the existing approaches and focus on the applications to protein folding, interactions, and post-translational modifications.

Indexed as

Protein FoldingProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalAnimalsHumansNuclear Magnetic Resonance, Biomolecularcell compartmentalizationintracellular processingmolecular cell biologynuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)post-translational modification (PTM)protein foldingstructural biology

Identifiers

PMID26677229
PMCPMC4759160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.