ArticleClinical pediatrics2016
Impact of an Electronic Template on Documentation of Obesity in a Primary Care Clinic.
Article in Clinical pediatrics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recorded diagnosis of overweight/obesity in primary care is linked to obesity care performance rates.Pediatric research · 2025Article
- Evaluation and significance of a digital assistant for patient history-taking and physical examination in telemedicine.Oxford open digital health · 2024Article
- Paediatric obesity: Documentation, screening, and pharmacotherapy in a national cohort.Pediatric obesity · 2023Article
- Lack of Age-Appropriate Reference Intervals Causing Potentially Missed Alerts in Clinical Reports of Dyslipidemia.The Journal of pediatrics · 2023Article
- Childhood obesity diagnosis and management remains a challenge despite the use of electronic health records: A retrospective study.Health science reports · 2022Article
- Implementing clinical decision support for reducing women Veterans' cardiovascular risk in VA: A mixed-method, longitudinal study of context, adaptation, and uptake.Frontiers in health services · 2022Article
- Quality assessment of functional status documentation in EHRs across different healthcare institutions.Frontiers in digital health · 2022Article
- Template Design and Analysis: Integrating Informatics Solutions to Improve Clinical Documentation.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2020Article
- Adoption of an Electronic Medical Record Tool for Childhood Obesity by Primary Care Providers.Applied clinical informatics · 2020Article
- A resident-led project to improve documentation of overweight and obesity in a primary care clinic.Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identification of obesity at well-child care (WCC) examinations is a step toward intervention. Studies have shown suboptimal documentation in primary care clinics that can improve with the use of electronic health records (EHRs). This study investigated the impact of a standardized EHR template on documentation of obesity at WCC visits and its impact on physician behavior. A cohort of 585 children with severe early onset obesity (body mass index >99th percentile, age <6 years) was identified with an electronic algorithm. Complete records of visit notes were reviewed to extract history taking, counseling, and recording of obesity at a WCC visit. Use of a standardized EHR template for WCC visits is associated with improvement in rates of documentation of obesity (47% vs 34%, P < .01), without interruption of workflow. Documentation of obesity in the chart improved nutritional (66% vs 44%, P < .001) and physical activity counseling (23% vs 9%, P < .001).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.