Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26676757›Full record

ArticleCancer research2016

Integrated Genomic Analysis of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinomas Reveals Genomic Rearrangement Events as Significant Drivers of Disease.

Stephen J Murphy, Steven N Hart, Geoffrey C Halling, Sarah H Johnson, James B Smadbeck, Travis Drucker, Joema Felipe Lima, Fariborz Rakhshan Rohakhtar, Faye R Harris, Farhad Kosari and 8 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Phase 1 trial of Vismodegib and Erlotinib combination in metastatic pancreatic cancer.Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.] · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Patient-derived xenograft cryopreservation and reanimation outcomes are dependent on cryoprotectant type.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stephen J MurphyDepartment of Biomarker Discovery, Center for Individualized Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota. Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Steven N HartHealth Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Geoffrey C HallingDepartment of Biomarker Discovery, Center for Individualized Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota. Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Sarah H JohnsonDepartment of Biomarker Discovery, Center for Individualized Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota. Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
James B SmadbeckDepartment of Biomarker Discovery, Center for Individualized Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota. Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Travis DruckerDepartment of Biomarker Discovery, Center for Individualized Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota.
Joema Felipe LimaDepartment of Biomarker Discovery, Center for Individualized Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota.
Fariborz Rakhshan RohakhtarMedical Genomics Facility, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Faye R HarrisDepartment of Biomarker Discovery, Center for Individualized Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota. Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Farhad KosariDepartment of Biomarker Discovery, Center for Individualized Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota. Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Subbaya SubramanianDepartment of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Gloria M PetersenHealth Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Timothy D WiltshireDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Benjamin R KippDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Mark J TrutyDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Robert R McWilliamsDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Minnesota.
Fergus J CouchHealth Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. vasmatzis.george@mayo.edu couch.fergus@mayo.edu.
George VasmatzisDepartment of Biomarker Discovery, Center for Individualized Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota. Department of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. vasmatzis.george@mayo.edu couch.fergus@mayo.edu.
Mayo Clinic · US

Funding

Tissue CoreP50CA102701 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI COHEN, PETER A · 2004 to 2018
$32.7M
Role of Vav1 protooncogene in pancreatic cancerP20CA102701 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC COLL OF MEDICINE, ROCHESTER · PI PETERSEN, GLORIA M. · 2003 to 2003
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS CA102701NCI NIH HHS P20 CA102701NCI NIH HHS P50 CA102701
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many somatic mutations have been detected in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), leading to the identification of some key drivers of disease progression, but the involvement of large genomic rearrangements has often been overlooked. In this study, we performed mate pair sequencing (MPseq) on genomic DNA from 24 PDAC tumors, including 15 laser-captured microdissected PDAC and 9 patient-derived xenografts, to identify genome-wide rearrangements. Large genomic rearrangements with intragenic breakpoints altering key regulatory genes involved in PDAC progression were detected in all tumors. SMAD4, ZNF521, and FHIT were among the most frequently hit genes. Conversely, commonly reported genes with copy number gains, including MYC and GATA6, were frequently observed in the absence of direct intragenic breakpoints, suggesting a requirement for sustaining oncogenic function during PDAC progression. Integration of data from MPseq, exome sequencing, and transcriptome analysis of primary PDAC cases identified limited overlap in genes affected by both rearrangements and point mutations. However, significant overlap was observed in major PDAC-associated signaling pathways, with all PDAC exhibiting reduced SMAD4 expression, reduced SMAD-dependent TGFβ signaling, and increased WNT and Hedgehog signaling. The frequent loss of SMAD4 and FHIT due to genomic rearrangements strongly implicates these genes as key drivers of PDAC, thus highlighting the strengths of an integrated genomic and transcriptomic approach for identifying mechanisms underlying disease initiation and progression.

Indexed as

AnimalsCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalCell Line, TumorDisease ProgressionGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene RearrangementGenomicsHumansMiceMice, Inbred NODMice, SCIDPancreatic NeoplasmsSignal Transduction

Identifiers

PMID26676757
PMCPMC4926317
OpenAlexW2259741002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.