Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26676725›Full record

ReviewDer Urologe. Ausg. A2016

[Bladder exstrophy: Quality of primary care and long-term prognosis].

W H Rösch, M Promm

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

W H RöschKlinik für Kinderurologie in Kooperation mit der Universität Regensburg, Klinik St. Hedwig Regensburg, Steinmetzstr. 1-3, 93049, Regensburg, Deutschland. wolfgang.roesch@barmherzige-regensburg.de.
M PrommKlinik für Kinderurologie in Kooperation mit der Universität Regensburg, Klinik St. Hedwig Regensburg, Steinmetzstr. 1-3, 93049, Regensburg, Deutschland.
Kinderklinik Regensburg · DEKrankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is universally agreed that successful and gentle initial bladder closure is decisive for favorable long-term outcome. Due to a number of reasons, including a lack of comparable multicenter studies, there are numerous concepts for initial exstrophy closure. DISCUSSION: Therefore, we describe our concept of delayed, staged reconstruction without osteotomy in classical bladder exstrophy, while taking into considerion the available literature on long-term follow-up as well as on own clinical and research data.

conclusionMost notably there are multiple medical but also psychological advantages of a delayed procedure. Primary closure without osteotomy is feasible and has no disadvantages in the long-term follow-up when compared to the invasive procedure of osteotomy. Due to high intravesical pressure, initial bladder neck surgery might have negative effects on bladder development and on the upper urinary tract.

Indexed as

Bladder ExstrophyEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMaleMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresPelvic BonesPlastic Surgery ProceduresTreatment OutcomeUrinary IncontinenceUrologic Surgical ProceduresBladder neck surgeryInitial closureLong term resultsOsteotomyUrinary tract

Identifiers

PMID26676725
OpenAlexW2419135733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.