Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26676583›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016

Reply to Rubenstein and Rubenstein: Time to move on from ideological debates on rewilding.

Jens-Christian Svenning, Pil B M Pedersen, C Josh Donlan, Rasmus Ejrnæs, Søren Faurby, Mauro Galetti, Dennis M Hansen, Brody Sandel, Christopher J Sandom, John W Terborgh and 1 more

Abstract readLetterComment
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Unintentional rewilding: lessons for trophic rewilding from other forms of species introductions.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Soil biological responses to, and feedbacks on, trophic rewilding.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
  3. Trophic rewilding: impact on ecosystems under global change.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jens-Christian SvenningSection for Ecoinformatics & Biodiversity, Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark; svenning@bios.au.dk.
Pil B M PedersenSection for Ecoinformatics & Biodiversity, Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark;
C Josh DonlanAdvanced Conservation Strategies, Midway, UT 84049; Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 15853;
Rasmus EjrnæsSection for Biodiversity & Conservation, Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, DK-8410 Rønde, Denmark;
Søren FaurbySection for Ecoinformatics & Biodiversity, Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark;
Mauro GalettiDepartamento de Ecologia, Universidade Estadual Paulista, 13506-900 Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brazil;
Dennis M HansenInstitute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland;
Brody SandelSection for Ecoinformatics & Biodiversity, Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark;
Christopher J SandomWildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Recanati-Kaplan Centre, Oxfordshire OX13 5QL, United Kingdom;
John W TerborghCenter for Tropical Conservation, Nicholas School of the Environment and Earth Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708;
Frans W M VeraCommunity and Conservation Ecology, Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, 9700 CC Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemAnimalsHumans

Identifiers

PMID26676583
PMCPMC4711874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.