ReviewDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2016
[Vascular resection and reconstruction techniques in pancreatic surgery].
Review in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of an enhanced anti-infection prophylaxis strategy for pancreatoduodenectomy: a single centre analysis.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2024Article
- Use of the peritoneum or the round ligament of the liver in radical surgery for pancreatic cancer.Gland surgery · 2021Article
- Implementation of a strategic preoperative surgical meeting to improve the level of care at a high-volume pancreatic center: a before-after analysis of 1000 consecutive cases.Updates in surgery · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVascular resection interventions and the associated necessity of a reconstruction for maintenance particularly of hepatic and small intestinal perfusion are important aspects especially for the surgical treatment of pancreatic cancer. An R0 resection is the only curative treatment option for patients with pancreatic cancer. Venous or arterial vascular infiltration by the tumor and the associated resection and reconstruction for complete tumor removal and establishment of a sufficient perfusion of the dependent organs represents one of the greatest challenges in pancreatic surgery. In addition the oncological significance with respect to arterial vascular resections is controversial.
objectiveIn this review article the indications and technical aspects of vascular resection and reconstruction in the therapy of pancreatic cancer are presented and discussed based on the current literature. MATERIAL AND
methodsA systematic search of Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library was carried out to identify studies reporting the results of venous or arterial vascular resection techniques, postoperative morbidity, mortality and patient survival after surgery for pancreatic cancer. Results Pancreatic cancer with vascular infiltration should not principally be seen as non-resectable but must always be checked for the possibility of a curative resection. A decisive factor is the differentiation between venous and arterial vascular involvement. Various safe technical options are available for venous vascular resection, depending on the extent of tumor infiltration. Arterial vascular resections are associated with an increased morbidity and mortality. In selected patients a complete tumor resection and prolonged survival can be achieved by arterial vascular resection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.