SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2015
Adjuvant (post-surgery) chemotherapy for early stage epithelial ovarian cancer.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 204 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery versus surgery followed by chemotherapy for initial treatment in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Adjuvant Chemotherapy Necessity in Stage I Ovarian Endometrioid Carcinoma: A SEER-Based Study Verified by Single-Center Data and Meta-Analysis.Oncology research · 2025Pooled it
- SEOM-GEICO clinical guideline on epithelial ovarian cancer (2023).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024Guideline
- Is There a Survival Benefit of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Stage IC1 Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Patients? A Meta-Analysis.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Pooled it
- Impact of Adjuvant Chemotherapy on FIGO Stage I Ovarian Clear Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for resectable cholangiocarcinoma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Frozen section diagnosis of borderline ovarian tumors with suspicious features of invasive cancer is a devil's dilemma for the surgeon: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2021Pooled it
- Neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery versus surgery followed by chemotherapy for initial treatment in advanced ovarian epithelial cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Chemotherapy versus surgery for initial treatment in advanced ovarian epithelial cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- The prevalence, risk factors, and prognostic value of venous thromboembolism in ovarian cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2021Pooled it
- Chemotherapy versus surgery for initial treatment in advanced ovarian epithelial cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Intraoperative frozen section analysis for the diagnosis of early stage ovarian cancer in suspicious pelvic masses.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Cisplatin Promotes Immunosuppression in Ovarian Cancer by Enhancing miR-181a-5p-Enriched Extracellular Vesicles to Drive Regulatory T Cell Differentiation.Journal of extracellular vesicles · 2026Article
- A Scoping Review of the Challenges and Future Perspectives in the Use of Alpha-Emitters for Metastatic Ovarian Cancer.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Roles of minimally invasive techniques in the management of epithelial ovarian cancer (Review).Oncology letters · 2026Review
- Clinical analysis of the impact of systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy on the prognosis of patients with early-stage ovarian cancer (stage IA-IIA): a propensity score matching study.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2026Article
- Subcellular Stress Markers in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Article
- Article
- Lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio after primary surgery is an independent prognostic factor for patients with epithelial ovarian cancer: A propensity score matching analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis is the second update of the review first published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews in 2009, Issue 1. Epithelial ovarian cancer is diagnosed in over 200,000 women worldwide each year. Ten to 20% of women are diagnosed early, when there is still a good possibility of cure. The treatment of early-stage (stage I and IIa) disease involves surgery to remove the disease, often followed by chemotherapy (adjuvant chemotherapy). The largest clinical trials of adjuvant chemotherapy show an overall survival (OS) advantage with platinum-based chemotherapy; however the precise role and type of this treatment in subgroups of women with differing prognoses needs to be defined.
objectivesTo undertake a systematic review of the evidence for adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer to determine whether chemotherapy following surgery offers a survival advantage over the policy of observation following surgery (with chemotherapy reserved for treatment of disease recurrence); and to determine if clinical subgroups of women with differing prognoses, based on histological subtype or completeness of surgical staging, have more or less to gain from adjuvant chemotherapy. SEARCH
methodsWe performed an electronic search using the Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Specialized Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2015, Issue 3), MEDLINE (1948 to March week 5, 2015), and EMBASE (1980 to week 14, 2015). We developed the search strategy using free-text and medical subject headings (MeSH). We also searched registers of clinical trials and citation lists of included studies for potentially relevant studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised clinical trials (RCTs) of women with early stage (I/IIa) epithelial ovarian cancer staged at laparotomy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed study quality of included RCTs. We resolved any disagreements by discussion with a third review author. We used random-effects methods for all meta-analyses, including subgroup analyses. MAIN
resultsThe original version of this Cochrane review included five RCTs involving 1277 women. In this 2015 update, no new studies met the inclusion criteria but we included an additional paper with mature data (10-year follow-up) relating to a previously included study (ICON1).We included four studies in the meta-analyses and considered them to be at a low risk of bias. Most study participants (> 95%) had stage I ovarian cancer. Meta-analysis of five-year data from three studies indicated that women who received adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy had better overall survival (OS) than those who did not (Hazard ratio (HR) 0.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53 to 0.93; 1008 women; 3 studies; I² statistic = 0%; high quality evidence). Likewise, meta-analysis of five-year data from four studies indicated that women who received adjuvant chemotherapy had better progression-free survival (PFS) than those who did not (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.84; 1170 women, 4 studies; I² statistic = 0%; high quality evidence). These findings were robust over time, with 10-year HR estimates of 0.72 (95% CI 0.57 to 0.92; 925 women, 2 studies) and 0.67 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.83; 925 women, 2 studies) for OS and PFS, respectively (high quality evidence). The risk of death at 10 years follow-up favoured the adjuvant chemotherapy arm (0.76, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.94; 923 women, 2 studies; I² statistic = 0%), as did the findings for risk of progression at 10 years (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.87; 925 women, 2 studies; I² statistic = 0%). Low quality evidence suggested that women with high-risk disease may have the most to gain from adjuvant chemotherapy. However, subgroup analyses could neither confirm nor exclude survival benefits in lower risk disease or in optimally staged disease. We found insufficient data to compare adverse events and long term risks between chemotherapy and observation groups. AUTHORS'
conclusionsHigh-quality evidence indicates that adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy is effective in prolonging survival in women with early stage (FIGO stage I/IIa) epithelial ovarian cancer. It remains uncertain whether women with low- and intermediate-risk early stage disease will benefit as much from adjuvant chemotherapy as women with high-risk disease. Decisions to use adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in these women should be mindful of this uncertainty, and the uncertainty regarding adverse events. Treatment of women with lower risk disease should be individualised to take into account individual factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.