ArticleCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy2015
Abrupt progression of ventricular septal perforation after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.
Article in Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sandwich repair for postinfarction ventricular septal rupture and left ventricular rupture.General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A 61-year-old-man was transferred to our hospital because of progressive heart failure after reperfusion for acute myocardial infarction (MI). When he visited the local hospital with severe chest pain associated with inferior MI, transthoracic echocardiography revealed small ventricular septal perforation (VSP). The patient had emergent coronary angiography, which revealed total occlusion of the mid-portion of the right coronary artery. Primary angioplasty was successful for reperfusion. However, because of hemodynamic instability the patient was transferred to our hospital. Under these conditions, transthoracic echocardiography which was undertaken 3 hours after primary angioplasty, demonstrated progressive enlargement of the VSP probably due to reperfusion injury. The rupture site, which was further enlarged at the time of operation, was repaired using the patch exclusion technique. The patient could discharge without complications. We suggest that primary angioplasty may potentially induce late reperfusion injury in patients with VSP complicating MI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.