ArticleSurgical endoscopy2016
Is expedited early discharge following elective surgery for colorectal cancer safe? An analysis of short-term outcomes.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Transition from hospital to home after elective colorectal surgery performed in an enhanced recovery program: An integrative review.Nursing open · 2021Review
- Validity and Utility Testing of a Criteria-led Discharge Checklist to Determine Post-operative Recovery after Abdominal Surgery: an International Multicentre Prospective Cohort Trial.World journal of surgery · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEnhanced recovery pathways have become standard practice after elective colorectal surgery to improve postoperative care while reducing length of stay in hospital. However, there is concern that early discharge may result in increased rates of adverse events including readmission. This study aims to determine whether it is safe to discharge patients on postoperative day 1 or 2 if they have undergone an elective colorectal operation for cancer.
methodsThe 2012 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program dataset was used. The study included patients who underwent elective colorectal cancer surgery and were discharged on postoperative day (POD) 1 or 2 (expedited early discharge) versus POD 3 or 4 (standard early discharge). Patients who had metastases, concurrent procedures including ostomy creation, or died during admission were excluded. Primary outcomes were 30-day adverse events (serious complications, mortality and reoperations) and readmission rates, which were analyzed using multivariable regression.
resultsA total of 305 and 2277 patients were identified in the expedited and standard early discharge groups, respectively. There were 6 (1.97 %) adverse events and 16 (5.56 %) readmissions in the expedited group, compared to 59 (2.59 %) and 135 (6.24 %) in the standard group. No statistical difference was found between the cohorts with respect to 30-day adverse events (OR 0.93, p = 0.87, 95 % CI [0.41-2.12]) or readmission rate (OR 1.03, p = 0.90, 95 % CI [0.61-1.76]).
conclusionPatients discharged by POD 2 after elective oncologic colon resections did not have significantly more adverse events or readmissions compared to patients discharged later. Select patients may be safely discharged earlier.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26675940What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.