Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26675584›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

Social density processes regulate the functioning and performance of foraging human teams.

Andrew J King, Julia P Myatt, Ines Fürtbauer, Nathan Oesch, Robin I M Dunbar, Seirian Sumner, James R Usherwood, Stephen Hailes, M Rowan Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Emergence and repeatability of leadership and coordinated motion in fish shoals.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Andrew J KingBiosciences, College of Science, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK.
Julia P MyattBiosciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, West Midlands, B15 2TT, UK.
Ines FürtbauerBiosciences, College of Science, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK.
Nathan OeschSENRG, Department of Experimental Psychology, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3UD, UK.
Robin I M DunbarSENRG, Department of Experimental Psychology, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3UD, UK.
Seirian SumnerSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1UG, UK.
James R UsherwoodStructure &Motion Laboratory, Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL9 7TA, UK.
Stephen HailesDepartment of Computer Science, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
M Rowan BrownCollege of Engineering, Swansea University, Bay Campus, Fabian Way, Swansea SA1 8EN.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 095061
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social density processes impact the activity and order of collective behaviours in a variety of biological systems. Much effort has been devoted to understanding how density of people affects collective human motion in the context of pedestrian flows. However, there is a distinct lack of empirical data investigating the effects of social density on human behaviour in cooperative contexts. Here, we examine the functioning and performance of human teams in a central-place foraging arena using high-resolution GPS data. We show that team functioning (level of coordination) is greatest at intermediate social densities, but contrary to our expectations, increased coordination at intermediate densities did not translate into improved collective foraging performance, and foraging accuracy was equivalent across our density treatments. We suggest that this is likely a consequence of foragers relying upon visual channels (local information) to achieve coordination but relying upon auditory channels (global information) to maximise foraging returns. These findings provide new insights for the development of more sophisticated models of human collective behaviour that consider different networks for communication (e.g. visual and vocal) that have the potential to operate simultaneously in cooperative contexts.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorInterpersonal RelationsSocial BehaviorAdolescentAdultAlgorithmsAnalysis of VarianceDecision MakingFeeding BehaviorFemaleGroup ProcessesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychomotor PerformanceYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26675584
PMCPMC4682145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.