Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26675325›Full record

ReviewGastrointestinal tumors2014

Unique Clinicopathology of Proximal Gastric Carcinoma: A Critical Review.

Qin Huang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gastrointestinal tumors, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 91% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Qin HuangDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System and Harvard Medical School, West Roxbury, Mass., USA.
VA Boston Healthcare System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGastric cancer is a heterogeneous disease with respect to its molecular and histopathological features. Proximal gastric carcinoma (PGC) and distal gastric carcinoma (DGC) are two distinct clinical entities, suggesting the existence of different pathogenic mechanisms. PGC arises in a narrow region of the proximal stomach below the gastroesophageal junction. It accounts for around half of gastric cancers in men, with an increasing incidence worldwide and a predominance in elderly males. SUMMARY: At present, the pathogenic mechanisms involved in the onset of PGC remain unknown. This mini-review presents the most recent findings on the pathology and natural history of this widespread and frequently fatal cancer. KEY MESSAGE: PGC has unique clinicopathological characteristics distinct from esophageal adenocarcinoma and DGC. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Patients with a high risk for PGC, such as elderly obese men, should undergo upper endoscopy for early detection and appropriate endoscopic therapy in the early stages of disease. Once it has progressed, the cancer is more easily spread, although the current staging systems are not perfectly adapted to the disease. PGC should be staged and treated as a gastric cancer. A separate staging system and genomic studies on this cancer are urgently needed for optimal patient management and appropriate disease prevention.

Indexed as

CarcinomaChineseGastric cancerGastric cardiaProximal stomach

Identifiers

PMID26675325
PMCPMC4645575
OpenAlexW2007833683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.