Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26675247›Full record

Trial reportAddictive behaviors2016

Craigslist versus print newspaper advertising for recruiting research participants for alcohol studies: Cost and participant characteristics.

Christopher J Gioia, Linda Carter Sobell, Mark B Sobell, Sangeeta Agrawal

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Addictive behaviors, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Brain Health Attitudes, Awareness and Actions in Middle-Aged Latinos.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher J GioiaDepartment of Psychology, Brogden Hall, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706-1611, USA.
Linda Carter SobellNova Southeastern University, College of Psychology, 3301 College Ave., Fort Lauderdale, FL 33314, USA. Electronic address: sobelll@nova.edu.
Mark B SobellNova Southeastern University, College of Psychology, 3301 College Ave., Fort Lauderdale, FL 33314, USA.
Sangeeta AgrawalGallup Consulting, 1001 Gallup Drive, Omaha, NE 68102, USA.
Nova Southeastern University · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Promoting Self-Change From Alcohol Problems: Mechanisms of Change in a CommunityR21AA017136 · NIAAA · NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI SOBELL, LINDA C · 2007 to 2008
$322k
NIAAA NIH HHS 5R21AA017136NIAAA NIH HHS R21 AA017136PHS HHS U50/CCU30086
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTechnology has transformed our lifestyles in dramatic and significant ways, including new and less expensive options for recruiting study participants. This study examines cost and participant differences between two recruitment sources, Craigslist (CL), and print newspapers (PNs). This paper also reviewed and compared studies involving clinical trials published since 2010 that recruited participants using CL alone or in combination with other methods.

methodSecondary data analyses from a parent study involving a randomized controlled trial of a mail-based intervention to promote self-change with problem drinkers.

resultsSignificant differences were found between CL and PN participants on most demographic and pretreatment drinking variables. While all participants had AUDIT scores suggestive of an alcohol problem and reported drinking at high-risk levels, CL participants had less severe drinking problem histories, were considerably younger, and had a higher socioeconomic status than PN participants. The total advertising costs for the 65 CL ads ($275) were significantly less than the 69 PN ads ($33, 311). The recruiting cost per eligible participant was vastly less expensive using CL ($1.46) compared to print newspaper ads ($116.88).

conclusionsUsing CL is a viable recruitment method for soliciting participants, particularly those that are younger, for alcohol intervention studies. It is also less expensive than newspaper ads. When CL participants were recruited, they reported being slightly more confident to change their drinking than PN participants. Limitations of using CL are discussed, including that some initial ad responders gave inconsistent answers to similar questions and a few tried to enter the study more than once.

Indexed as

Patient SelectionAdultAdvertisingAgedAlcohol DrinkingBiomedical ResearchCosts and Cost AnalysisFemaleFloridaHumansMaleMiddle AgedNewspapers as TopicSocial MediaYoung AdultAlcoholCraigslistDrinkingInternetRecruitmentSocial media

Identifiers

PMID26675247
PMCPMC4713235
OpenAlexW2179219525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.