Trial reportHealth education research2016
A randomized crossover study of web-based media literacy to prevent smoking.
Trial report in Health education research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07074860 (Clinical Screening and Peer Interventions to Prevent Substance Use in At-Risk Adolescents), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Clinical Screening and Peer Interventions to Prevent Substance Use in At-Risk Adolescents
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Strategies for enhancing the implementation of school-based policies or practices targeting risk factors for chronic disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Comparison between two asynchronous teaching methods in an undergraduate dental course: a pilot study.BMC medical education · 2022Trial
- Media literacy interventions: meta-analytic review of 40 years of research.Human communication research · 2025Article
- Teaching methods for critical thinking in health education of children up to high school: A scoping review.PloS one · 2024Article
- E-Cigarette-Related Nicotine Misinformation on Social Media.Substance use & misuse · 2022Article
- Using Intervention Mapping to Develop a Media Literacy-Based Smoking Prevention Program for Female Adolescents.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Tobacco and Alcohol on Television: A Content Analysis of Male Adolescents' Favorite Shows.Preventing chronic disease · 2018Article
- Media/Marketing Influences on Adolescent and Young Adult Substance Abuse.Current addiction reports · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Feasibly implemented Web-based smoking media literacy (SML) programs have been associated with improving SML skills among adolescents. However, prior evaluations have generally had weak experimental designs. We aimed to examine program efficacy using a more rigorous crossover design. Seventy-two ninth grade students completed a Web-based SML program based on health behavior theory and implemented using a two-group two-period crossover design. Students were randomly assigned by classroom to receive media literacy or control interventions in different sequences. They were assessed three times, at baseline (T0), an initial follow-up after the first intervention (T1) and a second follow-up after the second intervention (T2). Crossover analysis using analysis of variance demonstrated significant intervention coefficients, indicating that the SML condition was superior to control for the primary outcome of total SML (F = 11.99; P < 0.001) and for seven of the nine individual SML items. Results were consistent in sensitivity analyses conducted using non-parametric methods. There were changes in some exploratory theory-based outcomes including attitudes and normative beliefs but not others. In conclusion, while strength of the design of this study supports and extends prior findings around effectiveness of SML programs, influences on theory-based mediators of smoking should be further explored.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.