Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26675142›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2015

Cumulative social risk exposure and risk of cancer mortality in adulthood.

Rishi Caleyachetty, Parisa Tehranifar, Jeanine M Genkinger, Justin B Echouffo-Tcheugui, Peter Muennig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rishi CaleyachettyDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. r.caleyachetty@icloud.com.
Parisa TehranifarDepartment of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA. pt140@columbia.edu.
Jeanine M GenkingerDepartment of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA. jg3081@cumc.columbia.edu.
Justin B Echouffo-TcheuguiHubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA. justin.basile.echouffo.tcheugui@emory.edu.
Peter MuennigDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. pm124@columbia.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdults in the United States (U.S) can be simultaneously exposed to more than one social risk factor over their lifetime. However, cancer epidemiology tends to focus on single social risk factors at a time. We examined the prospective association between cumulative social risk exposure and deaths from cancer in a nationally representative sample of U.S. adults.

methodsThe study included 8745 adults (aged≥40 years) in the NHANES Survey III Mortality Study over a median follow-up of 13.5 years (1988-1994 enrollment dates and 1988 through 2006 for mortality data). Social risk factors (low family income, low education level, minority race, and single-living status) were summed to create a cumulative social risk score (0 to ≥3). We used Cox proportional hazard models to estimate age- and sex-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for the association between cumulative social risk with deaths from all-cancers combined, tobacco-related cancers, and screening-detectable cancers.

resultsDeaths from all-cancers combined (P for trend=0.001), tobacco-related cancers (P for trend=<0.001), and lung cancer (P for trend=0.01) increased with an increasing number of social risk factors. As compared with adults with no social risk factors, those exposed to ≥3 social risk factors were at increased risk of deaths from all-cancers combined (HR=1.8, 95% CI=1.3-2.4), tobacco-related cancers (HR=2.6, 95% CI: 1.6-4.0), and lung cancer (HR=2.3, 95% CI=1.3-4.1).

conclusionsU.S. adults confronted by higher amounts of cumulative social risk appear to have increased mortality from all-cancers combined, tobacco-related cancers, and lung cancer. An enhanced understanding of the cumulative effect of social risk factors may be important for targeting interventions to address social disparities in cancer mortality.

Indexed as

AdultAgedEducational StatusFemaleHumansIncomeLung NeoplasmsMaleMarital StatusMiddle AgedNeoplasmsNutrition SurveysProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesRacial GroupsRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID26675142
PMCPMC4682241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.