Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26674954›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2015

Are flies kind to kin? The role of intra- and inter-sexual relatedness in mediating reproductive conflict.

Emily S Martin, Tristan A F Long

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Sex-biased demography modulates male harm across the genome.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Sexual selection modulates genetic conflicts and patterns of genomic imprinting.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Inbreeding strategies under social and sexual complexity: insights from female and male guppies.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Emily S MartinDepartment of Biology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2 L 3C5.
Tristan A F LongDepartment of Biology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2 L 3C5 tlong@wlu.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As individual success often comes at the expense of others, interactions between the members of a species are frequently antagonistic, especially in the context of reproduction. In theory, this conflict may be reduced in magnitude when kin interact, as cooperative behaviour between relatives can result in increased inclusive fitness. Recent tests of the potential role of cooperative behaviour between brothers in Drosophila melanogaster have proved to be both exciting and controversial. We set out to replicate these experiments, which have profound implications for the study of kin selection and sexual conflict, and to expand upon them by also examining the potential role of kinship between males and females in reproductive interactions. While we did observe reduced fighting and courtship effort between competing brothers, contrary to previous studies we did not detect any fitness benefit to females as a result of the modification of male antagonistic behaviours. Furthermore, we did not observe any differential treatment of females by their brothers, as would be expected if the intensity of sexual conflict was mediated by kin selection. In the light of these results, we propose an alternative explanation for observed differences in male-male conflict and provide preliminary empirical support for this hypothesis.

Indexed as

AnimalsConflict, PsychologicalCourtshipDrosophila melanogasterFemaleLongevityMaleReproductionSexual Behavior, AnimalSocial Behavioraggressioninclusive fitnesskin selectionsexual conflictsexual selectionsocial behaviour

Identifiers

PMID26674954
PMCPMC4707750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.