Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26674811›Full record

ReviewBlood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue2016

Convalescent plasma: new evidence for an old therapeutic tool?

Giuseppe Marano, Stefania Vaglio, Simonetta Pupella, Giuseppina Facco, Liviana Catalano, Giancarlo M Liumbruno, Giuliano Grazzini

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 194 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
194citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04358783 phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Phase II, Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Clinical Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Plasma From Patients Cured of COVID-19 Compared to the Best Available Therapy in Subjects With SARS-CoV-2 Pneumonia

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital Universitario Dr. Jose E. GonzalezRan2020 to 2021Enrolled31ConditionsCoronavirus InfectionArmsPlasma, Best Available Therapy
NCT04385043 phase2 / phase3unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy and Safety of Hyperimmune Plasma Treatment in Patients With COVID-19 Severe Infection

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of CatanzaroRan2020 to 2021Enrolled400ConditionsCOVID-19Armsplasma hyperimmune, standard therapy
NCT04502472 phase2 / phase3terminatednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Treatment of Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) With Convalescent Plasma Collected From Individuals With Documented Infection and Recovery From COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2)

TypeinterventionalSponsorInova Health Care ServicesRan2020 to 2020Enrolled109ConditionsCovid-19ArmsConvalescent plasma transfusion
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

194 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 334 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Lessons learned from the use of convalescent plasma for the treatment of COVID-19 and specific considerations for immunocompromised patients.Transfusion and apheresis science : official journal of the World Apheresis Association : official journal of the European Society for Haemapheresis · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Should timing be considered before abandoning convalescent plasma in covid-19? Results from the Turkish experience.Transfusion and apheresis science : official journal of the World Apheresis Association : official journal of the European Society for Haemapheresis · 2021
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Hyperimmune Globulins in COVID-19.Current topics in microbiology and immunology · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

134 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Giuseppe MaranoItalian National Blood Centre, National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.
Stefania VaglioItalian National Blood Centre, National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.
Simonetta PupellaItalian National Blood Centre, National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.
Giuseppina FaccoItalian National Blood Centre, National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.
Liviana CatalanoItalian National Blood Centre, National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.
Giancarlo M LiumbrunoItalian National Blood Centre, National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.
Giuliano GrazziniItalian National Blood Centre, National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.
Azienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino · ITSapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Passive immunisation for the prevention and treatment of human infectious diseases can be traced back to the 20(th) century. The recent Ebola virus outbreak in West Africa has turned the spotlight onto the possible use of convalescent whole blood and convalescent plasma in the treatment of infectious diseases because they are the only therapeutic strategy available in some cases, given the unavailability of vaccines, drugs or other specific treatments. Convalescent blood products could be a valid option in the treatment/prophylaxis of several infectious diseases both in association with other drugs/preventive measures and as the only therapy when a specific treatment is not available. However, there are still some issues to consider in determining the advisability of implementing a large-scale convalescent plasma transfusion programme.

Indexed as

Blood Component TransfusionConvalescenceEbolavirusPlasmaAfrica, WesternDisease OutbreaksHemorrhagic Fever, EbolaHumans

Identifiers

PMID26674811
PMCPMC4781783
OpenAlexW2412511529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.