Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26674353›Full record

Trial reportBMC cancer2015

Comparison of the Roche cobas® 4800 and Digene Hybrid Capture® 2 HPV tests for primary cervical cancer screening in the HPV FOCAL trial.

Darrel A Cook, Wendy Mei, Laurie W Smith, Dirk J van Niekerk, Kathy Ceballos, Eduardo L Franco, Andrew J Coldman, Gina S Ogilvie, Mel Krajden

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Comparison of the SureXFrontiers in oncology · 2025
    Article
  9. The Role of p16/Ki67 Dual Staining in Cervical Cancer Screening.Current issues in molecular biology · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytology used for triage in cervical cancer opportunistic screening.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Darrel A CookBC Cancer Agency, 675 West 10th Ave, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1L3, Canada.
Wendy MeiLower Mainland Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 655 West 12th Ave, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4R4, Canada.
Laurie W SmithBC Cancer Agency, 675 West 10th Ave, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1L3, Canada.
Dirk J van NiekerkBC Cancer Agency, 675 West 10th Ave, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1L3, Canada.
Kathy CeballosBC Cancer Agency, 675 West 10th Ave, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1L3, Canada.
Eduardo L FrancoMcGill University, 845 Rue Sherbrooke O, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Andrew J ColdmanBC Cancer Agency, 675 West 10th Ave, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1L3, Canada.
Gina S OgilvieBC Centre for Disease Control, 655 West 12th Ave, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4R4, Canada.
Mel KrajdenBC Centre for Disease Control, 655 West 12th Ave, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4R4, Canada. mel.krajden@bccdc.ca.
BC Cancer Agency · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAMcGill University · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research MCT82072
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHPV FOCAL is a randomized trial (ISRCTN79347302, registered 20 Apr 2007) comparing high-risk (hr) HPV testing vs. liquid-based cytology (LBC) for cervical cancer screening of women aged 25-65. We compared the Digene Hybrid Capture® 2 High-Risk HPV DNA Test® (HC2) and the Roche cobas® 4800 HPV Test (COBAS) for primary screening.

methodsWomen (n=6,172) were screened at baseline by HC2 and COBAS and by LBC 24 months later. We assessed HPV genotyping and reflex LBC for colposcopy triage of baseline HPV positive women.

resultsOverall HC2/COBAS agreement was 96.1% (kappa 0.75) and positive agreement was 77.5%. Baseline CIN2 and CIN3+ rates based on HPV screening were 8.6/1,000 and 6.6/1,000 respectively; 24 month rates were 0.7/1,000 and 0.4/1,000 (LBC screening). HC2 and COBAS were concordant positive for 91% of round 1 CIN2 and 98% of CIN3+. CIN3+ was significantly associated with HPV 16 (Odds Ratio [OR] 5.11; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.30, 11.37), but not HPV 18 (OR 2.62; 95% CI 0.73, 9.49), vs. non-HPV 16/18 HPV at baseline. There was no significant association between HPV genotype and CIN2. CIN3+ was significantly more likely for high-grade (OR 5.99; 95% CI 2.53, 14.18), but not low-grade (OR 0.54; 95% CI 0.20, 1.49), vs. negative LBC. No significant association was observed between LBC grade and CIN2. HPV 16 and 18 were associated with 33% of CIN2 and 68% of CIN3+ identified at baseline.

conclusionsFor hrHPV positive women, abnormal reflex LBC is appropriate for colposcopy triage. In addition, immediate referral of women with HPV 16/18 and normal cytology may allow for earlier detection of CIN2+ lesions which would not be detected until after follow-up testing.

Indexed as

AdultAlphapapillomavirusColposcopyDNA, ViralEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPapillomavirus InfectionsReproducibility of ResultsUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsVaginal SmearsDNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID26674353
PMCPMC4682219
OpenAlexW2200031007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.