Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26674325›Full record

ArticleSurgical neurology international2015

Nonfunctioning giant pituitary adenomas: Invasiveness and recurrence.

José Alberto Landeiro, Elissa Oliveira Fonseca, Andrea Lima Cruz Monnerat, Giselle Fernandes Taboada, Gustavo Augusto Porto Sereno Cabral, Felippe Antunes

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical neurology international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. KJournal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Contemporary Management of Clinically Non-functioning Pituitary Adenomas: A Clinical Review.Clinical medicine insights. Endocrinology and diabetes · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

José Alberto LandeiroDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hospital Universitário Antônio Pedro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Elissa Oliveira FonsecaDepartment of Pathology, Hospital Universitário Antônio Pedro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Andrea Lima Cruz MonneratDepartment of Pathology, Hospital Universitário Antônio Pedro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Giselle Fernandes TaboadaDepartment of Endrocrinology, Hospital Universitário Antônio Pedro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Gustavo Augusto Porto Sereno CabralDepartment of Neurosurgery, Galeão Air Force Hospital, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Felippe AntunesDepartment of Pathology, Hospital Universitário Antônio Pedro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Hospital Universitário Antônio Pedro · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe report our surgical series of 35 patients with giant nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (GNFPA). We analyzed the rule of Ki-67 antigen expression in predicting recurrence.

methodsThirty-five patients were operated between 2000 and 2010. Suprassellar extension of the tumors were classified according to Hardy and Mohr based on magnetic resonance (MR) studies. Pituitary endocrine function and MR scans were assessed preoperatively and at 1, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Immunohistochemical studies were based in regard to the expression of the proliferative Ki-67 index and the hormonal receptor for luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, growth hormone, thyroid stimulating hormone, adrenocorticotropic hormone, and prolactin. Tumors specimens were obtained from 35 patients with GNFPA. Endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery was the approach of choice.

resultsThirty-five patients were submitted to 49 surgeries, 44 (89.8%) were transsphenoidal and 5 (10.2%) were transcranial. The most frequent preoperative complaints were visual acuity impairment and visual field defect in 25 (71.2%) and 23 (65.7%) cases, respectively. Improvement of visual acuitiy and visual field deficit after surgery was seen in 20 (80%) and 17 (73.9%) patients, respectively. Endocrinological deficits were encountered in 20 patients (57.1%). After surgery, 18 patients (51.4%) required hormonal replacement. Three patients had visual symptoms related to pituitary apoplexy and recovered after surgery. The Ki-67 labeling index (LI) ranged from <1% to 4.8%. The rate of recurrence in tumors with Ki-67 <3% was 7.7% (2 patients), Ki-67 >3% was present in 5 patients and the recurrence committed 3 patients.

conclusionIn our series, regardless the improvement of visual function and compressing symptoms, 5 patients with expression of Ki-67 LI more than 3% experienced a recurrence.

Indexed as

InvasivenessKi-67pituitary adenomarecurrence

Identifiers

PMID26674325
PMCPMC4665135
OpenAlexW2203716661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.