Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26673707›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2016

Cap homeostasis is independent of poly(A) tail length.

Daniel L Kiss, Kenji M Oman, Julie A Dougherty, Chandrama Mukherjee, Ralf Bundschuh, Daniel R Schoenberg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The mRNA decapping machinery targetsLife science alliance · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Stage-specific requirement for METTL3-dependent mJournal of translational medicine · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. RNA regulatory processes in RNA virus biology.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA · 2019
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. A recap of RNA recapping.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA · 2019
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel L KissCenter for RNA Biology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA Department of Biological Chemistry and Pharmacology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Kenji M OmanCenter for RNA Biology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA Department of Physics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Julie A DoughertyCenter for RNA Biology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA Department of Biological Chemistry and Pharmacology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Chandrama MukherjeeCenter for RNA Biology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA Department of Biological Chemistry and Pharmacology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Ralf BundschuhCenter for RNA Biology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA Department of Physics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, and Division of Hematology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Daniel R SchoenbergCenter for RNA Biology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA Department of Biological Chemistry and Pharmacology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA schoenberg.3@osu.edu.
The Ohio State University · US

Funding

Relationship of Cytoplasmic Capping to Post-transcriptional Gene RegulationR01GM084177 · NIGMS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SCHOENBERG, DANIEL R. · 2010 to 2018
$2.7M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA0093338NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM084177
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cap homeostasis is a cyclical process of decapping and recapping that maintains the cap on a subset of the cytoplasmic transcriptome. Interfering with cytoplasmic capping results in the redistribution of target transcripts from polysomes to non-translating mRNPs, where they accumulate in an uncapped but nonetheless stable form. It is generally thought that decapping is preceded by shortening of the poly(A) tail to a length that can no longer support translation. Therefore recapped target transcripts would either have to undergo cytoplasmic polyadenylation or retain a reasonably long poly(A) tail if they are to return to the translating pool. In cells that are inhibited for cytoplasmic capping there is no change in the overall distribution of poly(A) lengths or in the elution profile of oligo(dT)-bound targets. Poly(A) tail lengths were similar for target mRNAs on polysomes or in non-translating mRNPs, and the presence of polyadenylated uncapped mRNA in mRNPs was confirmed by separation into capped and uncapped pools prior to assay. Finally, in silico analysis of cytoplasmic capping targets revealed significant correlations with genes encoding transcripts with uridylated or multiply modified 3' ends, and genes possessing multiple 3'-untranslated regions (UTRs) generated by alternative cleavage and polyadenylation.

Indexed as

Poly APolyadenylationRNA Caps3' Untranslated RegionsAnimalsCell LineCytoplasmHomeostasisPolyribosomesProtein BiosynthesisRibonucleoproteinsRNA, MessengerRNA, Untranslated3' Untranslated Regionsmessenger ribonucleoproteinPoly ARibonucleoproteinsRNA CapsRNA, MessengerRNA, Untranslated

Identifiers

PMID26673707
PMCPMC4705677
OpenAlexW2204390533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.