Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26673328›Full record

ArticleCell reports2015

Differential DNA Methylation Analysis without a Reference Genome.

Johanna Klughammer, Paul Datlinger, Dieter Printz, Nathan C Sheffield, Matthias Farlik, Johanna Hadler, Gerhard Fritsch, Christoph Bock

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Functional genomics in Spiralia.Briefings in functional genomics · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Ten Years of EWAS.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021
    Review
  7. Acute social isolation alters neurogenomic state in songbird forebrain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. MUW researcher of the month.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Johanna KlughammerCeMM Research Center for Molecular Medicine of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Paul DatlingerCeMM Research Center for Molecular Medicine of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Dieter PrintzChildren's Cancer Research Institute, St. Anna Kinderkrebsforschung, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Nathan C SheffieldCeMM Research Center for Molecular Medicine of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Matthias FarlikCeMM Research Center for Molecular Medicine of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Johanna HadlerCeMM Research Center for Molecular Medicine of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Gerhard FritschChildren's Cancer Research Institute, St. Anna Kinderkrebsforschung, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Christoph BockCeMM Research Center for Molecular Medicine of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, 1090 Vienna, Austria; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; Max Planck Institute for Informatics, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany. Electronic address: cbock@cemm.oeaw.ac.at.
CeMM Research Center for Molecular Medicine · ATAustrian Academy of Sciences · ATMax Planck Institute for Informatics · DESt. Anna Children's Cancer Research InstituteSt Anna Children's Hospital · AT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF I 1575Austrian Science Fund FWF I 1626
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome-wide DNA methylation mapping uncovers epigenetic changes associated with animal development, environmental adaptation, and species evolution. To address the lack of high-throughput methods for DNA methylation analysis in non-model organisms, we developed an integrated approach for studying DNA methylation differences independent of a reference genome. Experimentally, our method relies on an optimized 96-well protocol for reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS), which we have validated in nine species (human, mouse, rat, cow, dog, chicken, carp, sea bass, and zebrafish). Bioinformatically, we developed the RefFreeDMA software to deduce ad hoc genomes directly from RRBS reads and to pinpoint differentially methylated regions between samples or groups of individuals (http://RefFreeDMA.computational-epigenetics.org). The identified regions are interpreted using motif enrichment analysis and/or cross-mapping to annotated genomes. We validated our method by reference-free analysis of cell-type-specific DNA methylation in the blood of human, cow, and carp. In summary, we present a cost-effective method for epigenome analysis in ecology and evolution, which enables epigenome-wide association studies in natural populations and species without a reference genome.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationGenomeAnimalsBlood CellsCarpsCattleChromosome MappingCpG IslandsDNAGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansLeukocytesSequence Analysis, DNASoftwareDNAbisulfite sequencingcomparative genomicscomputational epigeneticscross-species comparisondifferential methylation analysisDNA methylationnon-model organismsreference genome independent analysisRRBSvertebrate genomes

Identifiers

PMID26673328
PMCPMC4695333
OpenAlexW2190570000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.