ArticleBMC cancer2015
A patient perspective on shared decision making in stage I non-small cell lung cancer: a mixed methods study.
Article in BMC cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The impact of decision tools during oncological consultation with lung cancer patients: A systematic review within the I3LUNG project.Cancer medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Patient Perspectives on Perioperative Supportive Care Needs Surrounding Major Abdominal Operations for Cancer.Annals of surgical oncology · 2023Trial
- Impact of a Lung Cancer Screening Information Film on Informed Decision-making: A Randomized Trial.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2019Trial
- Time-to-event versus ten-year-absolute-risk in cardiovascular risk prevention - does it make a difference? Results from the Optimizing-Risk-Communication (OptRisk) randomized-controlled trial.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2016Trial
- Adherence to Oral Targeted Anti-Lung Cancer Therapy: A Qualitative Interview Study.Patient preference and adherence · 2022Article
- Engaging Patients with Late-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Shared Decision Making about Treatment.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Article
- Shared decision making in surgery: a scoping review of patient and surgeon preferences.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2020Article
- Patients' confidence in treatment decisions for early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Health and quality of life outcomes · 2020Article
- Empowering patients in decision-making in radiation oncology - can we do better?Molecular oncology · 2020Review
- The use of PROMs and shared decision-making in medical encounters with patients: An opportunity to deliver value-based health care to patients.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2020Article
- Using PROMs during routine medical consultations: The perspectives of people with Parkinson's disease and their health professionals.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2019Article
- Patient Preferences For Chemotherapy In The Treatment Of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicenter Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) Study In China.Patient preference and adherence · 2019Article
- Defining the information needs of lung cancer screening participants: a qualitative study.BMJ open respiratory research · 2019Article
- Racial and Ethnic Differences in Prostate Cancer Survivors' Perceived Engagement in Treatment Decision-Making.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2018Article
- Thoracic surgeon and patient focus groups on decision-making in early-stage lung cancer surgery.Future oncology (London, England) · 2018Article
- The evolution of uncertainty in second opinions about prostate cancer treatment.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2017Article
- Salvage surgery for local failures after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for early stage non-small cell lung cancer.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2016Article
- A critical review of recent developments in radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2016Review
- Early-Stage Lung Cancer Patients' Perceptions of Presurgical Discussions.MDM policy & practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSurgery and stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) are both curative treatment options for patients with a stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Consequently, there is growing interest in studying the role of patients in treatment decision making. We studied how patients with stage I NSCLC perceived shared decision making (SDM) in general, and how they viewed different aspects of SDM.
methodsA sequential mixed methods design was used, consisting of qualitative interviews (N=11), as well as a survey study (N=76) focusing on different SDM-related aspects. Participants were interviewed to understand their own experience with treatment decision making. In the survey study, patients rated the importance of 20 aspects of shared decision making that were identified during interviews. Descriptive analysis and explorative factor analysis were performed.
resultsWe assessed six qualitative themes covering SDM aspects that were determined by patients to be important. The survey identified four SDM-related factors with sufficient internal consistency, namely (1) 'guidance by clinician' (α=.741), (2) 'conduct of clinician' (α=.774); (3) 'preparation for treatment decision making' (α=.864); and (4) 'active role of patient in treatment decision making' (α=.782). Of these, clinician guidance was rated as most important by patients (M=3.61; SD=.44). Only 28.9% of patients in the survey study reported that both treatment options were discussed with them.
conclusionsPatients with a stage I NSCLC found clinician guidance to be important when making treatment decisions. Nevertheless, the majority of patients reported not being offered both treatment options, which might have influenced this finding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.