Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26673155›Full record

ArticleJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2015

Collagen fragment biomarkers as serological biomarkers of lean body mass - a biomarker pilot study from the DAHANCA25B cohort and matched controls.

Anders Nedergaard, Ulrik Dalgas, Hanne Primdahl, Jørgen Johansen, Jens Overgaard, Kristian Overgaard, Kim Henriksen, Morten Asser Karsdal, Simon Lønbro

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Biomarkers for Cancer Cachexia: A Mini Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  6. Biomarkers for cancer cachexia: where do we stand?Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2020
    Article
  7. Circulating Biomarkers of Testosterone's Anabolic Effects on Fat-Free Mass.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2019
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Anders NedergaardNordic Bioscience Biomarkers and Research Herlev, Denmark ; Institute of Sports Medicine Copenhagen (ISMC), Bispebjerg Hospital Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ulrik DalgasDept. of Public Health, Section for Sports Science, Aarhus University Aarhus, Denmark.
Hanne PrimdahlDept. of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus, Denmark.
Jørgen JohansenDept. of Oncology, Odense University Hospital Odense, Denmark.
Jens OvergaardDept. of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus, Denmark.
Kristian OvergaardDept. of Public Health, Section for Sports Science, Aarhus University Aarhus, Denmark.
Kim HenriksenNordic Bioscience Biomarkers and Research Herlev, Denmark.
Morten Asser KarsdalNordic Bioscience Biomarkers and Research Herlev, Denmark.
Simon LønbroDept. of Public Health, Section for Sports Science, Aarhus University Aarhus, Denmark ; Dept. of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus, Denmark.
Aarhus University Hospital · DKAarhus University · DKNordic Bioscience (Denmark) · DKBispebjerg Hospital · DKOdense University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLoss of muscle mass and function is an important complication to ageing and a range of pathologies, including, but not restricted to, cancer, organ failures, and sepsis. A number of interventions have been proposed ranging from exercise to anabolic pharmacological therapy, with varying success. Easily applicable serological biomarkers of lean and/or muscle mass and change therein would benefit monitoring of muscle mass during muscle atrophy as well as during recovery. We set out to validate if novel peptide biomarkers derived from Collagen III and VI were markers of lean body mass (LBM) or change therein in head and neck cancer patients in the Danish Head and Neck Cancer Group(DAHANCA) 25B cohort subjected to resistance training as well as in an age-matched and gender-matched control group.

methodsBlood samples and dual X-ray absorptiometry data were measured at baseline, after 12 and 24 weeks in 41 HNSCC subjects of the DAHANCA 25B cohort of subjects recovering from neck and head cancer (stages provided in Table 1), and at baseline only in 21 healthy age-matched and gender-matched controls. Serum from blood was analyzed for the ProC3, IC6, and C6M peptide biomarkers and LBM were derived from the dual X-ray absorptiometry scans.

resultsWe were not able to show any correlation between biomarkers and LBM or C6M and anabolic response to exercise in recovering head and neck cancer patients. However, we did find that the biomarkers IC6, IC6/C6M, and ProC3 are biomarkers of LBM in the control group subjects (R (2)/P of 0.249/0.035, 0.416/0.007 and 0.178 and P = 0.057, respectively).

conclusionIn conclusion, the IC6, ProC3, and IC6/C6M biomarkers are indeed biomarkers of LBM in healthy individuals of both genders, but not in HNSCC patients.

Indexed as

BiomarkerHead and neck cancerMuscleResistance training

Identifiers

PMID26673155
PMCPMC4670742
OpenAlexW1570567059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.