ArticleNeuroImage2016
The origins of metamodality in visual object area LO: Bodily topographical biases and increased functional connectivity to S1.
Article in NeuroImage, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immersive virtual reality-based rehabilitation for subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial.Journal of neurology · 2024Trial
- Brain circuit-gene expression relationships and neuroplasticity of multisensory cortices in blind children.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017Trial
- The Neural Organization of Visual Information in the Auditory Cortex of the Congenitally Deaf.Human brain mapping · 2026Article
- Resting-state functional connectivity changes following audio-tactile speech training.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- Loss of action-related function and connectivity in the blind extrastriate body area.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Brain Functional Topology Alteration in Right Lateral Occipital Cortex Is Associated With Upper Extremity Motor Recovery.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Expert Tool Users Show Increased Differentiation between Visual Representations of Hands and Tools.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021Article
- Is an artificial limb embodied as a hand? Brain decoding in prosthetic limb users.PLoS biology · 2020Article
- The 'creatures' of the human cortical somatosensory system.Brain communications · 2020Article
- Artificial limb representation in amputees.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2018Article
- Altered functional connectivity differs in stroke survivors with impaired touch sensation following left and right hemisphere lesions.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2018Article
- Reorganization of early visual cortex functional connectivity following selective peripheral and central visual loss.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Multisensory Processes: A Balancing Act across the Lifespan.Trends in neurosciences · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent evidence from blind participants suggests that visual areas are task-oriented and sensory modality input independent rather than sensory-specific to vision. Specifically, visual areas are thought to retain their functional selectivity when using non-visual inputs (touch or sound) even without having any visual experience. However, this theory is still controversial since it is not clear whether this also characterizes the sighted brain, and whether the reported results in the sighted reflect basic fundamental a-modal processes or are an epiphenomenon to a large extent. In the current study, we addressed these questions using a series of fMRI experiments aimed to explore visual cortex responses to passive touch on various body parts and the coupling between the parietal and visual cortices as manifested by functional connectivity. We show that passive touch robustly activated the object selective parts of the lateral-occipital (LO) cortex while deactivating almost all other occipital-retinotopic-areas. Furthermore, passive touch responses in the visual cortex were specific to hand and upper trunk stimulations. Psychophysiological interaction (PPI) analysis suggests that LO is functionally connected to the hand area in the primary somatosensory homunculus (S1), during hand and shoulder stimulations but not to any of the other body parts. We suggest that LO is a fundamental hub that serves as a node between visual-object selective areas and S1 hand representation, probably due to the critical evolutionary role of touch in object recognition and manipulation. These results might also point to a more general principle suggesting that recruitment or deactivation of the visual cortex by other sensory input depends on the ecological relevance of the information conveyed by this input to the task/computations carried out by each area or network. This is likely to rely on the unique and differential pattern of connectivity for each visual area with the rest of the brain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.