Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26672755›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2015

Partial PTEN deletion is linked to poor prognosis in breast cancer.

P Lebok, V Kopperschmidt, M Kluth, C Hube-Magg, C Özden, Taskin B, K Hussein, A Mittenzwei, A Lebeau, I Witzel and 14 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. The oncogenome of the domestic cat.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Is PTEN rs397510595 an Unexpected Guardian in Canine Mammary Neoplasia?International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

P LebokInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. p.lebok@uke.de.
V KopperschmidtInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. valeria.kopperschmidt@gmail.com.
M KluthInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. m.kluth@uke.de.
C Hube-MaggInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. c.hube@uke.de.
C ÖzdenInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. cansu.ozden@yahoo.com.
Taskin BInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. berivant@hotmail.de.
K HusseinInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. afrinlady5@hotmail.de.
A MittenzweiInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. anja_mittenzwei@onlinehome.de.
A LebeauInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. a.lebeau@uke.de.
I WitzelDepartment of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. iwitzel@uke.de.
L WölberDepartment of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. lwoelber@uke.de.
S MahnerDepartment of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. s.mahner@uke.de.
F JänickeDepartment of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. jaenicke@uke.de.
S GeistDepartment of Gynecology, Regio Clinic Pinneberg, Pinneberg, Germany. gyngebh.pinneberg@regiokliniken.de.
P PaluchowskiDepartment of Gynecology, Regio Clinic Pinneberg, Pinneberg, Germany. gyngebh.pinneberg@regiokliniken.de.
C WilkeDepartment of Gynecology, Regio Clinic Elmshorn, Elmshorn, Germany. christian.wilke@sana.de.
U HeilenkötterDepartment of Gynecology, Clinical Centre Itzehoe, Itzehoe, Germany. u.heilenkoetter@kh-itzehoe.de.
Ronald SimonInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. r.simon@uke.de.
Guido SauterInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. g.sauter@uke.de.
L TerraccianoDepartment of Pathology, Basel University Clinics, Basel, Switzerland. lterracciano@uhbs.ch.
R KrechInstitute of Pathology, Clinical Centre Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany. pathologie@ncid.net.
A von d AssenBreast Centre Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany. senologie@franziskus.com.
V MüllerDepartment of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. v.mueller@uke.de.
E BurandtInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. e.burandt@uke.de.
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DEUniversität Hamburg · DERegio Kliniken · DEHochschule Osnabrück · DEKlinikum Itzehoe · DEOsnabrück University · DEUniversity of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeletions of chromosome 10q23, including the PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homolog) locus, are known to occur in breast cancer, but systematic analyses of its clinical relevance are lacking.

methodsWe thus analyzed a tissue microarray (TMA) with 2,197 breast cancers by fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) using a PTEN-specific probe.

resultsPTEN deletions were detected in 19% of no special type, 9% of lobular, 4% of tubular cancers and 46% in carcinomas with medullary features. 98.7% of deletions were heterozygous and only 1.3% were homozygous. PTEN deletion was significantly linked to advanced tumor stage (p=0.0054), high-grade (p<0.0001), high tumor cell proliferation (Ki67 Labeling Index; p<0.0001), and shortened overall survival (p=0.0090). PTEN deletions were inversely associated with features of luminal type breast cancers (ER/PR positivity; p<0.0001 each, and CCND1 amplification; p=0.0020). PTEN deletions were also strongly linked to amplification of genes involved in the PTEN/AKT pathway such as MYC (p=0.0430) and HER2 (p=0.0065). Remarkably the combined analysis of MYC, HER2, CCND1 and PTEN aberrations suggested that aberrations of multiple PTEN/AKT pathway genes have a strong additive effect on breast cancer prognosis. While cancers with one of these aberrations behaved only marginally different from cancers with none, disease outcome was markedly worse in cancers with two or more aberrations as compared to those with only one aberration (p=0.0002). In addition, the particularly poor prognosis of patients with HER2 amplification and PTEN deletions challenges the concept of PTEN deletions interfering with trastuzumab therapy.

conclusionPTEN deletion occurs in a relevant fraction of breast cancers, and is linked to aggressive tumor behavior. Reduced PTEN function cooperates with MYC and HER2 activation in conferring aggressive phenotype to cancer cells.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsChromosome DeletionFemaleHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMiddle AgedPrognosisPTEN PhosphohydrolaseTissue Array AnalysisPTEN PhosphohydrolasePTEN protein, human

Identifiers

PMID26672755
PMCPMC4682275
OpenAlexW2216546343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.