ReviewJournal of ultrasonography2014
Recommendations regarding imaging of the central nervous system in fetuses and neonates.
Review in Journal of ultrasonography, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Retrospective Study on the Risk of Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Singleton Pregnancies with Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes between 24+0 and 36+6 Weeks, Using Regression Analysis for Various Factors.BioMed research international · 2018Trial
- The Assessment of the Usefulness of Prenatal Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Central Nervous System Defects.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Rapid head-pose detection for automated slice prescription of fetal-brain MRI.International journal of imaging systems and technology · 2021Article
- Seventeen years of prenatal magnetic resonance imaging at the Institute of Mother and Child in Warsaw.Polish journal of radiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An abnormal presentation of the central nervous system in a fetus during a screening examination is an indication for extended diagnosis, the aim of which is to explain the character of such an anomaly (a congenital defect, destructive effect of intrauterine infection or abnormality with reasons that are difficult to explain). Knowledge of normal development sequence of the fetal brain, which is discussed in this paper, is the basis for correct interpretation of imaging findings. Together with the increase in survival of preterm neonates, a high risk of early brain damage is still a problem in this extremely immature population. Therefore, imaging examinations become necessary. The paper presents intrauterine and postnatal risk factors of early brain damage as well as classification of such lesions, of hemorrhagic and hypoxic-ischemic etiology. The diagnosis of the cerebellum damage, which is currently believed to be a significant cause of autism, is emphasized. The evolution of lesions over time is also presented. Moreover, the elements of diagnosis important for prognosis are stressed. The standards of imaging examinations of the central nervous system include the schedule of ultrasound examinations and provide indications for extended diagnosis with the use of magnetic resonance imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.