Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26671276›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2016

MR imaging of ovarian masses: classification and differential diagnosis.

Pietro Valerio Foti, Giancarlo Attinà, Saveria Spadola, Rosario Caltabiano, Renato Farina, Stefano Palmucci, Giuseppe Zarbo, Rosario Zarbo, Maria D'Arrigo, Pietro Milone and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Comparing the diagnostic efficacy of [Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Pietro Valerio FotiRadiodiagnostic and Radiotherapy Unit, University Hospital "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele", Via Santa Sofia 78, 95123, Catania, Italy. pietrofoti@hotmail.com.
Giancarlo AttinàRadiodiagnostic and Radiotherapy Unit, University Hospital "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele", Via Santa Sofia 78, 95123, Catania, Italy.
Saveria SpadolaDepartment G.F. Ingrassia - Institute of Pathology, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Rosario CaltabianoDepartment G.F. Ingrassia - Institute of Pathology, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Renato FarinaRadiodiagnostic and Radiotherapy Unit, University Hospital "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele", Via Santa Sofia 78, 95123, Catania, Italy.
Stefano PalmucciRadiodiagnostic and Radiotherapy Unit, University Hospital "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele", Via Santa Sofia 78, 95123, Catania, Italy.
Giuseppe ZarboDepartment of General Surgery and Medical-Surgical Specialties - Institute of Obstetrics and Ginecology, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Rosario ZarboDepartment of General Surgery and Medical-Surgical Specialties - Institute of Obstetrics and Ginecology, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Maria D'ArrigoPathology Unit, University Hospital "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele", Catania, Italy.
Pietro MiloneRadiodiagnostic and Radiotherapy Unit, University Hospital "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele", Via Santa Sofia 78, 95123, Catania, Italy.
Giovanni Carlo EttorreRadiodiagnostic and Radiotherapy Unit, University Hospital "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele", Via Santa Sofia 78, 95123, Catania, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe propose a Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) guided approach to differential diagnosis of ovarian tumours based on morphological appearance.

backgroundCharacterization of ovarian lesions is of great importance in order to plan adequate therapeutic procedures, and may influence patient's management. Optimal assessment of adnexal masses requires a multidisciplinary approach, based on physical examination, laboratory tests and imaging techniques. Primary ovarian tumours can be classified into three main categories according to tumour origin: epithelial, germ cell and sex cord-stromal tumours. Ovarian neoplasms may be benign, borderline or malignant. Using an imaging-guided approach based on morphological appearance, we classified adnexal masses into four main groups: unilocular cyst, multilocular cyst, cystic and solid, predominantly solid. We describe MR signal intensity features and enhancement behaviour of ovarian lesions using pathologically proven examples from our institution.

conclusionMRI is an essential problem-solving tool to determine the site of origin of a pelvic mass, to characterize an adnexal mass, and to detect local invasion. The main advantages of MRI are the high contrast resolution and lack of ionizing radiation exposure. Although different pathological conditions may show similar radiologic manifestations, radiologists should be aware of MRI features of ovarian lesions that may orientate differential diagnosis. TEACHING POINTS: • Diagnostic imaging plays a crucial role in detection, characterization and staging of adnexal masses. • Characterization of an ovarian lesion may influence patient's management. • Different pathological conditions may have similar radiologic manifestations. • Non-neoplastic lesions should always be taken into consideration.

Indexed as

Magnetic resonance imagingOvarian cancerOvaryTNM stagingTumour staging

Identifiers

PMID26671276
PMCPMC4729709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.