Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26670777›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

Hierarchical deconstruction of mouse olfactory sensory neurons: from whole mucosa to single-cell RNA-seq.

Luis R Saraiva, Ximena Ibarra-Soria, Mona Khan, Masayo Omura, Antonio Scialdone, Peter Mombaerts, John C Marioni, Darren W Logan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 105 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
105citing papers in PubMed
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

105 citing papers in PubMed, 185 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. S3RL: Enhancing Spatial Single-Cell Transcriptomics With Separable Representation Learning.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. A neuron type-specific microexon inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Glomeruli of the Mouse Olfactory Bulb: Numbers, Sizes, Shapes.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

45 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Luis R SaraivaWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton-Cambridge, CB10 1SA, United Kingdom.
Ximena Ibarra-SoriaWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton-Cambridge, CB10 1SA, United Kingdom.
Mona KhanMax Planck Research Unit for Neurogenetics, Max-von-Laue-Strasse 4, 60438 Frankfurt, Germany.
Masayo OmuraMax Planck Research Unit for Neurogenetics, Max-von-Laue-Strasse 4, 60438 Frankfurt, Germany.
Antonio ScialdoneWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton-Cambridge, CB10 1SA, United Kingdom.
Peter MombaertsMax Planck Research Unit for Neurogenetics, Max-von-Laue-Strasse 4, 60438 Frankfurt, Germany.
John C MarioniWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton-Cambridge, CB10 1SA, United Kingdom.
Darren W LoganWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton-Cambridge, CB10 1SA, United Kingdom.
Max Planck Research Unit for Neurogenetics · DEWellcome Sanger Institute · GBEuropean Bioinformatics Institute · GBMonell Chemical Senses Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mouse olfactory mucosa is a complex chemosensory tissue composed of multiple cell types, neuronal and non-neuronal. We have here applied RNA-seq hierarchically, in three steps of decreasing cellular heterogeneity: starting with crude tissue samples dissected from the nose, proceeding to flow-cytometrically sorted pools of mature olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs), and finally arriving at single mature OSNs. We show that 98.9% of intact olfactory receptor (OR) genes are expressed in mature OSNs. We uncover a hitherto unknown bipartition among mature OSNs. We find that 19 of 21 single mature OSNs each express a single intact OR gene abundantly, consistent with the one neuron-one receptor rule. For the 9 single OSNs where the two alleles of the abundantly expressed OR gene exhibit single-nucleotide polymorphisms, we demonstrate that monoallelic expression of the abundantly expressed OR gene is extremely tight. The remaining two single mature OSNs lack OR gene expression but express Trpc2 and Gucy1b2. We establish these two cells as a neuronal cell type that is fundamentally distinct from canonical, OR-expressing OSNs and that is defined by the differential, higher expression of 55 genes. We propose this tiered experimental approach as a paradigm to unravel gene expression in other cellularly heterogeneous systems.

Indexed as

AnimalsCluster AnalysisComputational BiologyFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMaleMiceOlfactory MucosaOlfactory Receptor NeuronsReceptors, OdorantTranscriptomeReceptors, Odorant

Identifiers

PMID26670777
PMCPMC4680959
OpenAlexW2466175120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.