Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26670622›Full record

ArticleRNA (New York, N.Y.)2016

Double-stranded microRNA mimics can induce length- and passenger strand-dependent effects in a cell type-specific manner.

Mae A Goldgraben, Roslin Russell, Oscar M Rueda, Carlos Caldas, Anna Git

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RNA (New York, N.Y.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. MicroRNAs in neurodegenerative diseases: from molecular mechanisms to clinical biomarkers, detection methods and therapeutic strategies-advances and challenges.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. MicroRNAs and immunity in periodontal health and disease.International journal of oral science · 2018
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mae A GoldgrabenCancer Research UK-Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, United Kingdom.
Roslin RussellCancer Research UK-Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, United Kingdom.
Oscar M RuedaCancer Research UK-Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, United Kingdom.
Carlos CaldasCancer Research UK-Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, United Kingdom.
Anna GitCancer Research UK-Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, United Kingdom.
University of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 16942Medical Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MicroRNAs are short (17-26) noncoding RNAs driving or modulating physiological and pathological cellular events. Overexpression of miR-155 is pathogenic in B-cell malignancy but was also reported in a number of solid tumors-in particular, in breast cancer, where its role remains unclear and often contradictory. Using representative cell line models, we sought to determine whether the discrepant miR-155 effects in breast cancer could be explained by the heterogeneity of the disease. The growth of six breast cancer cell lines transfected with several miRNA mimics was analyzed. We found MCF-7 cell growth to be inhibited by miR-155 and miR-145 mimics, both 23-nt long, but not by a number of shorter mimics, including a universal commercial negative control. Microarray and Western blot analyses revealed induction of apoptosis, associated with interferon-β after activation of the double-stranded RNA sensor pathway. 3' Trimming of the miRNA mimics to 21 nt substantially reduced their growth-inhibitory potency. Mutating the canonical seed of the miR-155 mimic had no effect on the induced inhibition, which was abolished by mutating the miRNA seed of the artificial passenger strand. A panel of breast cancer cell lines showed a wide range of sensitivities to 23-mer mimics, broadly consistent with the sensitivity of the cell lines to Poly (I:C). We demonstrate two sources for nonspecific in vitro effects by miRNA mimics: duplex length and the artificial passenger strand. We highlight the danger of a universal 21-mer negative control and the importance of using matched seed mutants for reliable interpretation of phenotypes.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticApoptosisCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationEpithelial CellsFemaleHumansInterferon-betaMammary Glands, HumanMicroarray AnalysisMicroRNAsMolecular MimicryOrgan SpecificityPoly I-CRNA, Double-StrandedRNA, Small InterferingInterferon-betaMicroRNAsPoly I-CRNA, Double-StrandedRNA, Small InterferingdsRNA sensingmicroRNAmicroRNA mimicsmiR-155siRNA

Identifiers

PMID26670622
PMCPMC4712670
OpenAlexW2201322773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.