Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26670479›Full record

ArticleDiabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association2016

Relationship between insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion rate: not necessarily hyperbolic.

S H Kim, A Silvers, J Viren, G M Reaven

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Preserving insulin function in diabetes: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S H KimDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
A SilversSan Francisco, CA, USA.
J VirenSan Francisco, CA, USA.
G M ReavenDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Stanford University · US

Funding

Spectrum Stanford Center for clinical and Translational Research and EducationUL1TR001085 · NCATS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CULLEN, MARK RICHARD, GREENBERG, HARRY BERNARD · 2013 to 2017
$37.1M
WU P&FP30DK020579 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Clay F. Semenkovich · 2013 to 2026
$27.1M
Stanford Center for Clinical and Translational Education and Research (SCCTER)UL1UL1RR025744 · NCRR · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GREENBERG, HARRY BERNARD · 2008 to 2011
$22.4M
Stanford Center for Clinical and Translational Education and Research (SCCTER)KL2KL2RR025743 · NCRR · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GREENBERG, HARRY BERNARD · 2008 to 2011
$1.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001085NCRR NIH HHS KL2 RR025743NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025744NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK020579
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThere is general acceptance that the physiological relationship between insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion is hyperbolic. This conclusion has evolved from studies in which one test assessed both variables, and changes in plasma insulin concentration were used as a surrogate measure for insulin secretion rate. The aim of this study was to see if a hyperbolic relationship would also emerge when separate and direct measures were used to quantify both insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion rate.

methodsSteady-state plasma glucose (SSPG) was determined in 146 individuals without diabetes using the insulin suppression test, with 1/SSPG used to quantify insulin sensitivity. The graded-glucose infusion test was used to quantify insulin secretion rate. Plasma glucose and insulin concentrations obtained during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) were used to calculate surrogate estimates of insulin action and insulin secretion rate. A hyperbolic relationship was assumed if the β coefficient was near -1 using the following model: log (insulin secretion measure) = constant + β × log (insulin sensitivity measure).

resultsOGTT calculations of insulin sensitivity (Matsuda) and plasma insulin response [ratio of insulin/glucose area-under-the-curve (AUC) or insulin total AUC] provided the expected hyperbolic relationship [β = -0.95, 95% CI (-1.09, -0.82); -1.06 (-1.14, -0.98)]. Direct measurements of insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion rate did not yield the same curvilinear relationship [β = -1.97 (-3.19, -1.36)].

conclusionsThese findings demonstrate that the physiological relationship between insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion rate is not necessarily hyperbolic, but will vary with the method(s) by which it is determined.

Indexed as

Insulin ResistanceAdultAgedArea Under CurveBlood GlucoseFemaleGlucose Clamp TechniqueGlucose Tolerance TestHumansInsulinInsulin SecretionMaleMiddle AgedBlood GlucoseInsulin

Identifiers

PMID26670479
PMCPMC4911331
OpenAlexW2217448875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.