Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26670456›Full record

SynthesisSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2016

Agility in Team Sports: Testing, Training and Factors Affecting Performance.

Darren J Paul, Tim J Gabbett, George P Nassis

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 95 papers, 15 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed, 15 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05969197 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Effects of Match Play Exercises and Plyometric Training on Explosive Power, Agility and Functional Performance in Football Players

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled30ConditionsPower, Functional PerformanceArmsMatch Play Training, Plyometric Training
NCT06661226 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Effects of Acceleration Drills and Change in Direction Drills on Agility, Speed and Performance in Squash Players

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2024 to 2024Enrolled28ConditionsSports Physical TherapyArmsAccleration drills, Change in Direction Drills
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed, 15 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Darren J PaulAspetar-Qatar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, National Sports Medicine Programme, Excellence in Football Project, PO BOX 29222, Doha, Qatar. darren.paul@aspetar.com.
Tim J GabbettSchool of Exercise Science, Australian Catholic University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
George P NassisAspetar-Qatar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, National Sports Medicine Programme, Excellence in Football Project, PO BOX 29222, Doha, Qatar.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAgility is an important characteristic of team sports athletes. There is a growing interest in the factors that influence agility performance as well as appropriate testing protocols and training strategies to assess and improve this quality.

objectiveThe objective of this systematic review was to (1) evaluate the reliability and validity of agility tests in team sports, (2) detail factors that may influence agility performance, and (3) identify the effects of different interventions on agility performance.

methodsThe review was undertaken in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We conducted a search of PubMed, Google Scholar, Science Direct, and SPORTDiscus databases. We assessed the methodological quality of intervention studies using a customized checklist of assessment criteria.

resultsIntraclass correlation coefficient values were 0.80-0.91, 0.10-0.81, and 0.81-0.99 for test time using light, video, and human stimuli. A low-level reliability was reported for youth athletes using the video stimulus (0.10-0.30). Higher-level participants were shown to be, on average, 7.5% faster than their lower level counterparts. Reaction time and accuracy, foot placement, and in-line lunge movement have been shown to be related to agility performance. The contribution of strength remains unclear. Efficacy of interventions on agility performance ranged from 1% (vibration training) to 7.5% (small-sided games training).

conclusionsAgility tests generally offer good reliability, although this may be compromised in younger participants responding to various scenarios. A human and/or video stimulus seems the most appropriate method to discriminate between standard of playing ability. Decision-making and perceptual factors are often propositioned as discriminant factors; however, the underlying mechanisms are relatively unknown. Research has focused predominantly on the physical element of agility. Small-sided games and video training may offer effective methods of improving agility, although practical issues may hinder the latter.

Indexed as

Motor SkillsMovementSportsAthletic PerformanceExercise TestHumansPhysical Conditioning, HumanReaction TimeReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.