Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26670219›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Genomic and Gene-Expression Comparisons among Phage-Resistant Type-IV Pilus Mutants of Pseudomonas syringae pathovar phaseolicola.

Mark Sistrom, Derek Park, Heath E O'Brien, Zheng Wang, David S Guttman, Jeffrey P Townsend, Paul E Turner

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Bacteriophage-Insensitive Mutants of Antimicrobial-ResistantInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mark SistromSchool of Natural Sciences, University of California Merced, Merced, 95343, CA, United States of America.
Derek ParkDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, United States of America.
Heath E O'BrienDepartment of Cell and Systems Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 3B2, Canada.
Zheng WangDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, United States of America.
David S GuttmanDepartment of Cell and Systems Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 3B2, Canada.
Jeffrey P TownsendDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, United States of America.
Paul E TurnerDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, United States of America.
Yale University · USUniversity of Toronto · CAUniversity of California, Merced · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola (Pph) is a significant bacterial pathogen of agricultural crops, and phage Φ6 and other members of the dsRNA virus family Cystoviridae undergo lytic (virulent) infection of Pph, using the type IV pilus as the initial site of cellular attachment. Despite the popularity of Pph/phage Φ6 as a model system in evolutionary biology, Pph resistance to phage Φ6 remains poorly characterized. To investigate differences between phage Φ6 resistant Pph strains, we examined genomic and gene expression variation among three bacterial genotypes that differ in the number of type IV pili expressed per cell: ordinary (wild-type), non-piliated, and super-piliated. Genome sequencing of non-piliated and super-piliated Pph identified few mutations that separate these genotypes from wild type Pph--and none present in genes known to be directly involved in type IV pilus expression. Expression analysis revealed that 81.1% of gene ontology (GO) terms up-regulated in the non-piliated strain were down-regulated in the super-piliated strain. This differential expression is particularly prevalent in genes associated with respiration--specifically genes in the tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA) cycle, aerobic respiration, and acetyl-CoA metabolism. The expression patterns of the TCA pathway appear to be generally up and down-regulated, in non-piliated and super-piliated Pph respectively. As pilus retraction is mediated by an ATP motor, loss of retraction ability might lead to a lower energy draw on the bacterial cell, leading to a different energy balance than wild type. The lower metabolic rate of the super-piliated strain is potentially a result of its loss of ability to retract.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, BacterialGenomicsBacteriophagesBinding SitesCitric Acid CycleFimbriae, BacterialGene Expression ProfilingMutationPseudomonas syringaeRegulon

Identifiers

PMID26670219
PMCPMC4687649
OpenAlexW2951895070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.