Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26670031›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2016

Cytogenetic effects of three commercially formulated pesticides on somatic and germ cells of Allium cepa.

Aashiq H Kuchy, Aijaz A Wani, Azra N Kamili

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. 14,15-dihydroclerodin (CScientific reports · 2025
    Article
  3. TheMethods and protocols · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Neonicotinoid insecticides exert diverse cytotoxic and genotoxic effects on cultivated sunflower.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Article
  7. Investigation of cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of abamectin pesticide in Allium cepa L.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Anthropogenic Impacts on Meiosis in Plants.Frontiers in plant science · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aashiq H KuchyDepartment of Environmental Science/Centre of Research for Development, University of Kashmir, Srinagar (J&K), 190006, India. aashiqenv@gmail.com.
Aijaz A WaniDepartment of Botany, University of Kashmir, Srinagar (J&K), 190006, India.
Azra N KamiliDepartment of Environmental Science/Centre of Research for Development, University of Kashmir, Srinagar (J&K), 190006, India. azrakamili@gmail.com.
University of Kashmir · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cytological effects of Endosri-ES (endosulfan), Nuvan-NU (dichlorvos), and Kvistin-KS (carbendazim) were evaluated on mitotic and meiotic cells of Allium cepa. Test concentrations were chosen by calculating EC50 values of formulated ES, NU, and KS, which turned to be 60, 200, and 500 ppm (parts per million), respectively. Cytological studies were undertaken on root meristem cells of A. cepa using EC50, 1/2 × EC50, and 2 × EC50 of these pesticides for 24 and 48 h. Similarly, a meiotic study was conducted by applying the pesticides at the aforesaid concentrations from seedling to bud stage. A set of onion bulbs exposed to tap water was run parallel for negative control and maleic hydrazide (112.09 ppm) as positive control. During the study period, mitotic index (MI) decreased at all the pesticide concentrations compared to the negative control. Among various chromosomal aberrations, chromatin bridges, breaks, stickiness, laggard, vagrant chromosomes, fragments, C-mitosis, multipolarity, ring chromosome as well as micronuclei were observed in mitotic preparations. In contrast, meiotic aberrations revealed comparatively less frequency of chromosomal aberrations and the most frequent were lagging chromosome, stray bivalents, secondary association, chromatin bridge, disturbed anaphase, and stickiness. Comparative analysis of the pesticides showed that NU was highly toxic to plant cells than KS, while as ES showed intermediate effects between the two. Further, our study revealed that all the three pesticides produce genotoxic effects which can cause health risks to the human populations. Graphical Abstract ᅟ.

Indexed as

Cell NucleusChromosome AberrationsCytogeneticsDNA DamageGerm CellsHumansMeristemMitosisMitotic IndexOnionsPesticidesPlant RootsSoil PollutantsPesticidesSoil PollutantsAllium cepaEndosriKvistinMeiotic aberrationsMitotic indexNuvan

Identifiers

PMID26670031
OpenAlexW2198935320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.