Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26670025›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of pediatrics2016

Strategies implementation to reduce medicine preparation error rate in neonatal intensive care units.

Ainara Campino, Elena Santesteban, Pilar Pascual, Beatriz Sordo, Casilda Arranz, Maria Unceta, Ion Lopez-de-Heredia

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of pediatrics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Intravenous drug use in neonatal intensive care units.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2021
    Observational
  5. Article
  6. Intravenous medicine preparation technique training programme for nurses in clinical areas.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2018
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ainara CampinoHospital Pharmacy, Cruces University Hospital, Plaza de Cruces s/n, 48903, Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain. ainara.campinovillegas@osakidetza.eus.
Elena SantestebanNeonatal Epidemiology Unit, Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo, Spain.
Pilar PascualHospital Pharmacy, Cruces University Hospital, Plaza de Cruces s/n, 48903, Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain.
Beatriz SordoHospital Pharmacy, Cruces University Hospital, Plaza de Cruces s/n, 48903, Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain.
Casilda ArranzNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Paediatrics Department, Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo, Spain.
Maria UncetaHospital Biochemistry Laboratory, Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo, Spain.
Ion Lopez-de-HerediaNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Paediatrics Department, Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo, Spain.
Hospital de Cruces · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledThis study assessed the rate of errors in intravenous medicine preparation at bedside in neonatal intensive care units versus preparation error rate in a hospital pharmacy service before and after several strategies were implemented. We performed a prospective observational study during 2013-2015. Ten Spanish neonatal intensive care units and one hospital pharmacy service participated in the study. Two types of preparation errors were considered, calculation errors and accuracy errors. The study was carried out over three consecutive phases: (1) pre-intervention phase, when medicine preparation samples were collected from neonatal intensive care units and hospital pharmacy service according to their normal clinical practice; (2) intervention phase, when protocol standardisation and educational strategy took place; and (3) post-intervention phase, when new medicine samples were collected after strategy implementation. In neonatal intensive care units, 1.35 % of samples registered calculation errors in pre-intervention phase; no calculation errors were registered in hospital pharmacy service samples. In post-intervention phase, no calculation errors were registered in either group. Accuracy error rate decreased both in neonatal intensive care units (54.7 vs 23 %) and hospital pharmacy service (38.3 vs 14.6 %).

conclusionCalculation errors can disappear with good standardisation protocols. Decrease in accuracy error depends on good preparation technique and environmental factors. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Medication use is associated with a risk of errors and adverse events. Medication errors are more frequent and have more severe consequences in paediatric patients. • Lack of commercial drug formulations adapted to newborn infants makes medicine preparation process more prone to error. What is New: • Calculation errors are minimising using concentration standard protocols. Preparation rules are essential to ensure the accuracy process. • Environmental conditions affect the accuracy process.

Indexed as

Drug Dosage CalculationsDrug CompoundingHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalMedication ErrorsPharmacy Service, HospitalProspective StudiesVideo RecordingAccuracyIntravenous medicineMedication errorsNeonatal intensive care unitNewborn infantPreparation errors

Identifiers

PMID26670025
OpenAlexW2214785148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.