Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26669974›Full record

ArticleLeukemia2016

Risk factors for and outcomes of patients with POEMS syndrome who experience progression after first-line treatment.

T V Kourelis, F K Buadi, M A Gertz, M Q Lacy, S K Kumar, P Kapoor, R S Go, J A Lust, S R Hayman, V Rajkumar and 9 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Leukemia, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. POEMS syndrome: diagnosis, treatments, and outcomes.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Update on the POEMS syndrome.Blood research · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. POEMS syndrome: clinical update.Journal of neurology · 2019
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

T V KourelisDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
F K BuadiDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
M A GertzDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
M Q LacyDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
S K KumarDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
P KapoorDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
R S GoDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
J A LustDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
S R HaymanDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
V RajkumarDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
S R ZeldenrustDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
S J RussellDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
D DingliDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Y LinDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
N LeungDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Y L HwaDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
W GonsalvesDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
R A KyleDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
A DispenzieriDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although clinical improvement is almost universal with therapy in patients with POEMS (an acronym for polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathies, monoclonal protein and a variety of skin changes) syndrome, outcomes and management of patients who relapse or progress (R/P) after first-line treatment have not been described. We retrospectively identified 262 patients with POEMS syndrome treated at the Mayo Clinic from 1974 to 2014 and who had follow-up information. The 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was 58% and 78%, respectively. Median time to R/P was 42 months. Seventy-nine patients (30%) had an R/P, with 52 (19%) experiencing a symptomatic R/P. Eighteen patients relapsed with symptoms or signs that were not documented at diagnosis. Median times to vascular endothelial growth factor, hematologic, radiographic and clinical R/P were 35 months (range, 4-327 months), 72 months (range, 4-327 months), 51 months (range, 4-327 months) and 48 months (range, 6-311 months), respectively. On multivariate analyses, low albumin at diagnosis and failure to achieve a complete hematologic response to first-line therapy were independent risk factors for PFS. Thirty patients had documentation of a second R/P at a median of 26 months from diagnosis of the first R/P. An early R/P was a risk factor for death, but most patients with an R/P had salvageable disease. A majority of patients are still without R/P at 5 years from diagnosis.

Indexed as

Disease ProgressionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCombined Modality TherapyDisease-Free SurvivalDisease ManagementFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPOEMS SyndromeRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSalvage TherapyVascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Identifiers

PMID26669974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.