Trial reportGait & posture2016
Novel application of a Wii remote to measure spasticity with the pendulum test: Proof of concept.
Trial report in Gait & posture, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Objective assessment of spasticity by pendulum test: a systematic review on methods of implementation and outcome measures.Biomedical engineering online · 2020Pooled it
- A Feasible Method for Evaluating Post-Stroke Knee Spasticity: Pose-Estimation-Assisted Pendulum Test.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Pendulum test in chronic hemiplegic stroke population: additional ambulatory information beyond spasticity.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Neuromechanical Assessment of Activated vs. Resting Leg Rigidity Using the Pendulum Test Is Associated With a Fall History in People With Parkinson's Disease.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2020Article
- Predictive value of the pendulum test for assessing knee extensor spasticity.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2018Article
- Spurious cross-frequency amplitude-amplitude coupling in nonstationary, nonlinear signals.Physica A · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe pendulum test is a standard clinical test for quantifying the severity of spasticity. In the test, an electrogoniometer is typically used to measure the knee angular motion. The device is costly and difficult to set up such that the pendulum test is normally time consuming.
objectiveThe goal of this study is to determine whether a Nintendo Wii remote can replace the electrogroniometer for reliable assessment of the angular motion of the knee in the pendulum test.
methodsThe pendulum test was performed in three control participants and 13 hemiplegic stroke patients using both a Wii remote and an electrogoniometer. The correlation coefficient and the Bland-Altman difference plot were used to compare the results obtained from the two devices. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the difference between hemiplegia-affected and nonaffected sides in the hemiplegic stroke patients.
resultsThere was a fair to strong correlation between measurements from the Wii remote and the electrogoniometer (0.513<R(2)<0.800). Small but consistent differences between the Wii remote and electrogoniometer were identified from the Bland-Altman difference plot. Within the hemiplegic stroke patients, both devices successfully distinguished the hemiplegia-affected (spastic) side from the nonaffected (nonspastic) side (both with p<.0001*). In addition, the intraclass correlation coefficient, standard error of measurement, and minimum detectable differences were highly consistent for both devices.
conclusionOur findings suggest that the Wii remote may serve as a convenient and cost-efficient tool for the assessment of spasticity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.