Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26669936›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Bacterial Ghosts of Escherichia coli Drive Efficient Maturation of Bovine Monocyte-Derived Dendritic Cells.

Irshad Ahmed Hajam, Pervaiz Ahmad Dar, Elamurugan Appavoo, Subodh Kishore, Veerakyathappa Bhanuprakash, Kondabattula Ganesh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Bacteria-Based Nanoprobes for Cancer Therapy.International journal of nanomedicine · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Frontiers in immunology · 2022
    Article
  8. Hydrochloric acid-treatedMolecular & cellular toxicology · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Bacteria-Inspired Nanomedicine.ACS applied bio materials · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. AJournal of veterinary science · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Irshad Ahmed HajamFMD Research Center, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Bangalore, India.
Pervaiz Ahmad DarDivision of Veterinary Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, SKUAST-Kashmir, Srinagar, India.
Elamurugan AppavooFMD Research Center, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Bangalore, India.
Subodh KishoreFMD Research Center, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Bangalore, India.
Veerakyathappa BhanuprakashFMD Research Center, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Bangalore, India.
Kondabattula GaneshFMD Research Center, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Bangalore, India.
Indian Veterinary Research Institute · INVeterinary & Animal Husbandry · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial ghosts (BGs) are empty cell envelopes derived from Gram-negative bacteria. They not only represent a potential platform for development of novel vaccines but also provide a tool for efficient adjuvant and antigen delivery system. In the present study, we investigated the interaction between BGs of Escherichia coli (E. coli) and bovine monocyte-derived dendritic cells (MoDCs). MoDCs are highly potent antigen-presenting cells and have the potential to act as a powerful tool for manipulating the immune system. We generated bovine MoDCs in vitro from blood monocytes using E. coli expressed bovine GM-CSF and IL-4 cytokines. These MoDCs displayed typical morphology and functions similar to DCs. We further investigated the E. coli BGs to induce maturation of bovine MoDCs in comparison to E. coli lipopolysaccharide (LPS). We observed the maturation marker molecules such as MHC-II, CD80 and CD86 were induced early and at higher levels in BG stimulated MoDCs as compared to the LPS stimulated MoDCs. BG mediated stimulation induced significantly higher levels of cytokine expression in bovine MoDCs than LPS. Both pro-inflammatory (IL-12 and TNF-α) and anti-inflammatory (IL-10) cytokines were induced in MoDCs after BGs stimulation. We further analysed the effects of BGs on the bovine MoDCs in an allogenic mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR). We found the BG-treated bovine MoDCs had significantly (p<0.05) higher capacity to stimulate allogenic T cell proliferation in MLR as compared to the LPS. Taken together, these findings demonstrate the E. coli BGs induce a strong activation and maturation of bovine MoDCs.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationAnimalsAntigen PresentationCattleCytokinesDendritic CellsEscherichia coliKineticsLipopolysaccharidesLymphocyte Culture Test, MixedMonocytesPhenotypePlasmidsRNA, MessengerTranscription, GeneticCytokinesLipopolysaccharidesRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID26669936
PMCPMC4684396
OpenAlexW2215863350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.