Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26669862›Full record

ReviewCancer research2016

It's Totally Tubular....Riding The New Wave of Ovarian Cancer Research.

Ruth Perets, Ronny Drapkin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Systematic review and meta-analysis on the impact of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in reducing risk of ovarian cancer.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cellular Origins and Lineage Plasticity in Cancer.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Targeting and monitoring ovarian cancer invasion with an RNAi and peptide delivery system.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Expression and T cell regulatory action of the PD-1 immune checkpoint in the ovary and fallopian tube.American journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y. : 1989) · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ruth PeretsDivision of Oncology, Clinical Research Institute at Rambam, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel. rdrapkin@mail.med.upenn.edu Ru_Perets@rambam.health.gov.il.
Ronny DrapkinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ovarian Cancer Research Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. rdrapkin@mail.med.upenn.edu Ru_Perets@rambam.health.gov.il.

Funding

Vaccinating against IGFBP-2 to prevent ovarian cancer relapseP50CA083636 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI DRESCHER, CHARLES, URBAN, NICOLE DENISE · 1999 to 2015
$35.1M
Proteomic, Genomic, and Longitudinal Pathways to Ovarian Cancer Biomarker DiscoveryU01CA152990 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BIRRER, MICHAEL, SKATES, STEVEN J · 2010 to 2021
$8.9M
Elafin as a biomarker in serous ovarian cancers and basal-like breast tumorsR21CA156021 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI DRAPKIN, RONNY I · 2013 to 2014
$406k
NCI NIH HHS NIH P50-CA083636NCI NIH HHS NIH R21 CA-156021NCI NIH HHS NIH U01 CA-152990NCI NIH HHS P50 CA083636NCI NIH HHS R21 CA156021NCI NIH HHS U01 CA152990
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome carries significant mortality for young women if effective preventive and screening measures are not taken. Preventive salpingo-oophorectomy is currently the only method known to reduce the risk of ovarian cancer-related death. Histopathological analyses of these surgical specimens indicate that a high proportion of ovarian cancers in women at high risk and in the general population arise from the fallopian tube. This paradigm shift concerning the cell of origin for the most common subtype of ovarian cancer, high-grade serous carcinoma, has sparked a major effort within the research community to develop new and robust model systems to study the fallopian tube epithelium as the cell of origin of "ovarian" cancer. In this review, evidence supporting the fallopian tube as the origin of ovarian cancer is presented as are novel experimental model systems for studying the fallopian tube epithelium in high-risk women as well as in the general population. This review also addresses the clinical implications of the newly proposed cell of origin, the clinical questions that arise, and novel strategies for ovarian cancer prevention.

Indexed as

AnimalsFallopian TubesFemaleHumansMedical OncologyOvarian NeoplasmsResearch

Identifiers

PMID26669862
PMCPMC4703449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.