Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26669775›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of men's health2017

Healthy Eating and Active Living: Rural-Based Working Men's Perspectives.

John L Oliffe, Joan L Bottorff, Paul Sharp, Cristina M Caperchione, Steven T Johnson, Theresa Healy, Sonia Lamont, Margaret Jones-Bricker, Kerensa Medhurst, Sally Errey

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of men's health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03548077 (Harmonization Project), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03548077 nacompletednot on this map

Harmonization Project: Men's Healthy Eating Active Living (MHEAL)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of British ColumbiaRan2014 to 2019Enrolled227ConditionsMen, Health Behavior, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, CancerArmsPOWERPLAY
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Male Body Practices.American journal of men's health · 2017
    Review
  12. A Men's Workplace Health Intervention: Results of the POWERPLAY Program Pilot Study.Journal of occupational and environmental medicine · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

John L Oliffe1 University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Joan L Bottorff2 University of British Columbia, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.
Paul Sharp2 University of British Columbia, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.
Cristina M Caperchione2 University of British Columbia, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.
Steven T Johnson3 Athabasca University, Alberta, Canada.
Theresa Healy4 Northern Health, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada.
Sonia Lamont5 British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Margaret Jones-Bricker6 Canadian Cancer Society, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada.
Kerensa Medhurst6 Canadian Cancer Society, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada.
Sally Errey5 British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CABC Cancer Agency · CACanadian Cancer Society · CAAthabasca University · CAUniversity of Northern British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a pressing need for health promotion programs focused on increasing healthy eating and active living among "unreached" rural-based men. The purpose of the current study was to describe rural-based working men's views about health to distil acceptable workplace approaches to promoting men's healthy lifestyles. Two focus group interviews included 21 men who worked and lived in northern British Columbia, Canada. Interviews were approximately 2 hours in duration; data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Themes inductively derived included (a) food as quick filling fuels, (b) work strength and recreational exercise, and (c) (re)working masculine health norms. Participants positioned foods as quick filling fuels both at work and home as reflecting time constraints and the need to bolster energy levels. In the theme work strength and recreational exercise, men highlighted the physical labor demands pointing to the need to be resilient in overcoming the subarctic climate and/or work fatigue in order to fit in exercise. In the context of workplace health promotion programs for men, participants advised how clear messaging and linkages between health and work performance and productivity and cultivating friendly competition among male employees were central to reworking, as well as working, with established masculine health norms. Overall, the study findings indicate that the workplace can be an important means to reaching men in rural communities and promoting healthy eating and active living. That said, the development of workplace programs should be guided by strength-based masculine virtues and values that proactively embrace work and family life.

Indexed as

Diet, HealthyMen's HealthRural PopulationAdultBritish ColumbiaExerciseFocus GroupsHealth PromotionHealth SurveysHumansMaleMasculinityMiddle AgedYoung Adulthealth promotionhealthy eatingmasculinitymen’s healthphysical activity

Identifiers

PMID26669775
PMCPMC5675270
OpenAlexW2338173910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.