ArticleClinical neuroradiology2017
Low-Dose Volume-Perfusion CT of the Brain: Effects of Radiation Dose Reduction on Performance of Perfusion CT Algorithms.
Article in Clinical neuroradiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The value of a deep learning image reconstruction algorithm in whole-brain computed tomography perfusion in patients with acute ischemic stroke.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- Comparative analysis of two mathematical algorithms for the calculation of computed tomography perfusion parameters in the healthy and diseased pancreas.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2022Article
- Continuous Intraarterial Nimodipine Infusion for the Treatment of Delayed Cerebral Ischemia After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Retrospective, Single-Center Cohort Trial.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Cerebral CT Perfusion in Acute Stroke: The Effect of Lowering the Tube Load and Sampling Rate on the Reproducibility of Parametric Maps.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Prediction of outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage using data from patient admission.European radiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe aimed to compare different computed tomography (CT) perfusion post-processing algorithms regarding image quality of perfusion maps from low-dose volume perfusion CT (VPCT) and their diagnostic performance regarding the detection of ischemic brain lesions. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We included VPCT data of 21 patients with acute stroke (onset < 6h), which were acquired at 80 kV and 180 mAs. Low-dose VPCT datasets with 72 mAs (40 % of original dose) were generated using realistic low-dose simulation. Perfusion maps (cerebral blood volume (CBV); cerebral blood flow (CBF) from original and low-dose datasets were generated using two different commercially available post-processing methods: deconvolution-based method (DC) and maximum slope algorithm (MS). The resulting DC and MS perfusion maps were compared regarding perfusion values, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) as well as image quality and diagnostic accuracy as rated by two blinded neuroradiologists.
resultsQuantitative perfusion parameters highly correlated for both algorithms and both dose levels (r ≥ 0.613, p < 0.001). Regarding SNR levels and image quality of the CBV maps, no significant differences between DC and MS were found (p ≥ 0.683). Low-dose MS CBF maps yielded significantly higher SNR levels (p < 0.001) and quality scores (p = 0.014) than those of DC. Low-dose CBF and CBV maps from both DC and MS yielded high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of ischemic lesions (sensitivity ≥ 0.82, specificity ≥ 0.90).
conclusionOur results indicate that both methods produce diagnostically sufficient perfusion maps from simulated low-dose VPCT. However, MS produced CBF maps with significantly higher image quality and SNR than DC, indicating that MS might be more suitable for low-dose VPCT imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26669592What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.