Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26669570›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2016

The effect of dietary counselling on food intakes in pregnant women at risk for gestational diabetes: a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial RADIEL.

A Valkama, S Koivusalo, J Lindström, J Meinilä, H Kautiainen, B Stach-Lempinen, K Rönö, M Klemetti, M Pöyhönen-Alho, A Tiitinen and 5 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update.Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists · 2022
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Effect of a lifestyle intervention during pregnancy-findings from the Finnish gestational diabetes prevention trial (RADIEL).Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2018
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

A ValkamaDepartment of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
S KoivusaloDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Kätilöopisto Maternity Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
J LindströmDepartment of Chronic Disease Prevention, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
J MeiniläDepartment of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
H KautiainenDepartment of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
B Stach-LempinenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, South Karelia Central Hospital, Lappeenranta, Finland.
K RönöDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Kätilöopisto Maternity Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
M KlemettiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, South Karelia Central Hospital, Lappeenranta, Finland.
M Pöyhönen-AlhoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Jorvi Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
A TiitinenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Women's Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
E HuvinenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Jorvi Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
H LaivuoriDepartment of Medical Genetics, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
S AnderssonDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
R RoineDepartment of Health and Social Management, Research Centre for Comparative Effectiveness and Patient Safety, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
J G ErikssonDepartment of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Helsinki University Hospital · FIUniversity of Helsinki · FIJorvi Hospital · FISouth Karelia Central Hospital · FIFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare · FIInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesThe prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is increasing worldwide. GDM may be prevented by improving the diets of pregnant women. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of dietary counselling on the diets of pregnant women at GDM risk. SUBJECTS/

methodsThis study was a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial the Finnish gestational diabetes prevention study (RADIEL) in which pre-pregnant and pregnant women with previous GDM or BMI ⩾30 kg/m(2) were allocated into two groups, namely the control and the intervention groups. The control group received standard antenatal dietary counselling according to the Finnish Nutrition Recommendations. The intervention group participated in one individual dietary counselling session and one group dietary counselling session in addition to the standard counselling. This study included women who were recruited during pregnancy. To assess changes in food intake, food-intake questionnaires were collected during the first and the second trimester of pregnancy. Bootstrap type analysis of covariance was used, and 242 participants were included in the final analysis to study changes in food intake.

resultsThe intakes of low-fat cheese (baseline adjusted mean 0.09 times/day; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.07, 0.24; P=0.040) and fish (baseline adjusted mean 0.28 times per week; 95% CI 0.08, 0.49; P=0.011) showed a significant increase in the intervention group compared with the control group.

conclusionsThis study showed that dietary counselling in early pregnancy can lead to modest dietary improvements in pregnant women at GDM risk.

Indexed as

AdultCounselingDiabetes, GestationalDietDiet RecordsEatingFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansNutrition TherapyPregnancyTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID26669570
OpenAlexW2205056423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.